Why must our leaders say more? The truth of their statements will be proven by International and Local Law Enforcement. Asking them to comment only indicates someone who thinks they are guilty when they have already commented.
RUDLANDS known cross border criminals and it’s public Knowledge the Hawks have been trying to catch them. SA government entities queried where did they get the money to buy Tongaart Huellet.
Ewan Macmillian showed the crimes are in SA, in SA banks, by Rudlands
Al Jazeera tried to spin a group of Criminals doing crimes in SA, and put it on his Excellency who no evidence at all.
They underestimated the truth that this is a South African And Trans National Issue being treated as such by Global Law Enforcement.
A sitting President does not need to act to baseless allegations. Also anyone accused must first have their human right to innocent until proven guilty enshrined.
So he can’t speak on the guilt or non-guilt of Rudlands and Co because as a leader he has to protect the constitution which he is doing.
However there have been two very public statements which make sense:
However there have been two very public statements which make sense:
A – We are under attack by some Foreigners working with some locals (True and correct statement by his Excellency)
B – INNSCOR are ENEMIES of the State (The and correct statement by General Chiwenga)