Apparently, anyone who wishes to uphold the integrity of woman as a sex-based political class is a fundamentalist and purist. The idea that woman is categorised by her sex rather than ‘identity’ is the new extremist position to take. Women who advocate such an audacious…1.
stance have certainly felt the backlash to such a preposterous proposal and have been branded authoritarian, unpleasant and abusive. Nice deflection. And one that might work if we were truly few in number but the truth is many women and men hold this ‘extremist’ view. It is…2.
based on science after all. Our lived experiences are superfluous evidence to that fact. You could argue that the real purists are those who believe in ‘true trans’ - those whose subjective sense of self, as the opposite sex, is a genuine feeling that comes from the very…3.
bottom of their souls. Never mind that this belief manifests as regressive, objectifying stereotypes of women. Or that it violates boundaries and negates safeguarding. Purists hold these ‘true transers’ in such high regard, this small demographic of predominantly men, are to…4.
be protected and given special privileges that include the right to legally falsify their sex. What could possibly go wrong with regards to women’s right to political/proportional representation, single-sex provision, privacy and the rather more pressing, paramount issue of…5.
child safeguarding. Whatever the reasons behind the purists position - be it a genuine attempt at ‘balance’ or just pure male privilege - make no mistake, Starmer and @UKLabour are purists, they are ‘true trans’. No amount of rehearsed ‘sensible lines’ will detract from the…6.
fact Labour think 0.1% of women have penises. Insisting women make compromises to bring about a ‘balance’ of rights that result in the political erasure of the female sex sounds like age-old misogyny to me.
If calling to #RepealTheGRA and #AmendTheEA to remove the PC of…7.
gender reassignment is a ‘purist’ position to take, then I counter that it is only purist in the sense that a man cannot become a woman and should not be permitted to do so legally and that woman sure as hell does not have a penis. 8. #LabourLosingWomen petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6283…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hayton is right; the ‘trans’ issue is not about balancing needs but about doing the right thing. Of course women are right to protest the impact that allowing men to legally falsify their sex, has…1. unherd.com/thepost/trans-…
on women’s rights. That lie - that sex category error - that forms the GRA and is shored up by the protected characteristic of gender reassignment within the Equality Act, is contrary to doing the ‘right thing’. What happens, indeed, when you legally admit men into the female…2
sex class? Aside from the terrorisation of women in prison and the violation of single-sex spaces; all safeguarding protocols are negated across the board. What is deemed good for a small minority is a right to hide past employment records/ID, lie about one’s sex on official…3.
‘Transgenderism’ seeks to unmoor us from the reality of our sexed bodies, which for women results in the complete denial of what the female body experiences and is subjected to with regards male violence. As @KnownHeretic states, ‘it preaches disassociation from primary sense…
awareness.’ Believe not what your eyes and instinct tells you. It’s an attack, not only on boundaries but on the female body itself. It allows for the complete commodification, colonisation, objectification and pornification of women. This is, of course, is nothing new with the…
exception that it is being sold back to us as a form of human liberation from material bondage. Oh, the irony. In truth it’s a liberation of a no holds barred society where every kind of fetish/paraphilia is brought out into the glorious sunshine. Hence, the mainstreaming…
Apparently, the characteristic of GR is defined below. It’s a sex ‘reassignment’ process that involves physiological or other aspects of sex change. This process can be started with a mere thought - I think, therefore, I am. Or with the physical mimicry of gender stereotypes. 1.
Gender itself, is not defined but we all know it to be imposed behaviour/expectations placed on both sexes. In effect, GR applies to those who believe/wish they are/were the opposite sex. It is a characteristic based on belief, not fact. S7 describes the manifestation of…2.
that belief in a physical and metaphysical manner. It conflates sex with gender without ever explaining gender. We are just to accept that ‘transsexuals’ are people who are capable of sex change/reassignment. If that is not considered a belief then it must be a blatant lie…3.
Is it even ethical to be discussing amendments to the GRA, knowing it blatantly renders women politically powerless and is the antithesis of child-safeguarding? Those drafting the act knew it would affect women’s sex-based rights: from sex-discrimination/equality law, privacy…1
…political/proportional representation to safeguarding. The effects of sex-falsification on official documents that enables child-safeguarding violations, are indefensible.
Is it a level of moral bankruptcy to attempt to mitigate and compromise on a piece of legislation…2.
…clearly incongruent to the human rights of half the planet? Embedding the concept of ‘legal/acquired’ sex will do little to reinstate the biological reality of women and their right to exist as political beings with different needs to men. If this were a question of ethics…3.