Distinguishing between natural GHG emissions (belonging to the ecosphere) and anthropogenic ones (belonging to the technosphere) is important for designing effective mitigation interventions. Abating ecosphere emissions is conceptually ineffective.
We took advantage from the availability of data in the Serengeti area, with sound information both on wildlife and on livestock abundances.
The wildlife scenario is also dominated by one of Earth's last wild migrations, which is important for the system's carrying capacity.
(3/9)
Wild herbivore migrations allow to escape from top-down regulation by carnivores, which are territorial & cannot follow the moving herds. Additionally, herbivores access fresh pasture with a better nutritional content, & experience better environmental conditions (heat...)
- the basis of the productive system in #Loliondo, where herds get no concentrates in normal years and the profit from natural resources is maximized.
Our results show that the similarities in the...
(5/9)
...production system extend into greenhouse gas emissions. With some differences in the total biomass, both the wildlife- and the livestock-dominated systems achieve a very similar emission per ha, in the mean values we obtain after applying different estimations.
(6/9)
It implies that, in very low input systems as the ones present in Sub-Saharan Africa or South Asia, livestock could be occupying the ecological niche of wild herbivores researchgate.net/publication/33… & most of its GHG emissions belong to the ecosphere - they are not anthropogenic.
(7/9)
Both regions have well-conserved wild herbivore guilds, able to overtake livestock emissions in abandonment scenarios, yet are attributed with 38% of the global livestock emissions.
This highlights the need to reconsider low-input systems (fig. from researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publication…)
(8/9)
The study adds to the necessary considerations on well-managed livestock as an effective substitute of wild herbivores in the world's ecosystems, as we show in our recent video
). Con todo hubiera deseado que, ya que nos revisabas, hubieras mencionado por qué los argumentos de Monbiot no se sustentan, a nuestro entender. Ya te lo sabrás, pero va para el respetable.
@htejero_@Capitan_Swing Lo primero, enhorabuena a @capitan_swing por una estupenda promoción de un libro que, y así tu reseña lo confirma, no tiene nada de ciencia y mucho de ciencia ficción, pero ha conseguido resonar en todos los medios de comunicación. Cuando queráis me presto a algo parecido.
@htejero_@Capitan_Swing Dilema del espacio: es falaz.
No tiene nada que ver el uso del territorio que hace un cultivo (muerte y desplazamiento competitivo de todo lo que no sea la planta objeto de aprovechamiento) que el que hace un herbívoro doméstico. Los sistemas continentales han evolucionado...
La regenerativa adapta los principios de la movilidad pastoril a un contexto más sedentario, pero siempre imitando los principios ecológicos de la herbivoría silvestre. Ésta consigue altas densidades y productividades, y buen desempeño ambiental
Resulta una opción prometedora pero depende de la gestión adaptativa; conocimiento complejo para establecer periodos de pastado óptimos que varían según estaciones y años.
Un ámbito de aprendizaje q puede aprender del conocimiento local del pastoreo doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv…
(3/8)
Back in 2008, Anthony Barnosky had proposed a first estimate on how much herbivore was naturally populating Earth. He was not intending to close the issue - rather trying to open a debate that is very relevant for understanding and managing ecosystems.
Yet many have since then taken such estimate as written in stone, neither really understanding the scientific method (subjected to constant validation)