Firstly, there is no consisderation of the position of 🇳🇴🇪🇺🇮🇸🇱🇮. In short, why would this be good for us? Without that argument, this falls short.
2.
Why is the first thing that is discussed a UK opt-out, a major opt-out in fact, in this case Schengen? Just accept the package as is and apply for #EEA. Stop with the #ExtrawurstGroßbritannien
3.
But overall, this proposal has huge merit in that it is a) sane, and b) does not impinge on European freedom of action in the way that UK membership obviously would.
I would like to see a period of direct effect while trust was rebuilt.
4.
So, @edwinhayward, it is obvious what the benefit to the UK is. What's in your proposal for Europe? 🤔😃⭐️
No matter what relationship they ask for to get closer to Europe, Europe will retain its strategic and decision-making autonomy.
2.
This applies most obviously to the SM. The complexity of agreeing new rules and regulations, the tradeoffs needed, are already too complex without adding the UK.
Despite Europe's global leadership in regulation, this has been apparent to leaders in Bxl and capitals for years. The expansion to Central Europe, the CU with Turkey, and the close relationships with Ukraine and others are meant to give those states a close relationship with
the regional order, and to bulk up the region, in the event that the global order fails (owing to security, public health, environment, etc.)
This has been very successful, exporting not just European standards, but stability and European values in many cases too.
2.
the recent European generosity towards the UK in the protocol can be seen in that light: major UK divergence is now little more than a chimera; it will be dependent on Europe for regulation; it needs to be taken into the tent so as to contribute.
For another, Europe needed to protects its member states, citizens and way of life. It this it succeeded absolutely.
2.
But it is telling that the Brexiters and many Britons feel they have "lost". Quite simply, life is worse outside Europe and there is strength in unity.
But it is also clear that Brexit, apart from being foolish, was plain directionless from the off.
It looks to me like the "Stormont brake" will never be used, because the trade measures that'd follow would be enormous and fall disproportionately on WM parties' English constituencies.
Good. It won't leave potential lacunae in the SM or drag us into NI's byzantine politics.
You'd have to say, this, along with continued checks and monitoring at Larne, should go a long way to protecting the SM from lower GB standards.