"While responding to TASS Agency's question about Russia's new foreign policy concept, Mao said..."
Oh, Makes more sense. But interesting how even China keeps pushing this line, or finds it instrumental to use this when talking about "multilateralism" etc.
Interesting framing.
"China, Russia and India are all major emerging major countries with notable influence. As the international and regional landscape is facing profound and complex changes..."
'.....we are ready to strengthen communication with the international community including Russia and India and send a positive signal to the world about defending true multilateralism and jointly responding to global challenges"
Bilateral sambhaal lein pehle.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"....WhatsApp chats where Mukulika Banerjee, professor at LSE is....telling other students to reject the candidature of Mr Kataria for having alleged links with the Hindu right"
"According to evidence, she sent personalised messages to her students on WhatsApp....Firstpost has also accessed a call recording where one of the students of LSE can be heard claiming that Mukulika Banerjee called him to convey that Karan had links with the RSS or Hindu right"
I am sure this a dispassionate analysis of the Yatra.
Jaishankar: "For someone to say I am doing this because it's all counter terrorism content...an aircraft like a capability of an F-16, where everybody knows, you know where they are deployed and their use. You're not fooling anybody by saying these things" m.economictimes.com/news/defence/y…
But to be fair, they're still fooling some Indians who think raising any objection is tantamount to blasphemy in this relationship, and that India should just not react at all. Slightest disapproval and for some reason they automatically begin to "what about Russia?", as if by...
...pointing this out one isn't concerned or aware of what other countries have done with regards to supporting Pakistan. The point is about the difference in expectations, considering the fact that not all relationships will have the same significance in the coming years.
"Some link the disorder and the reaction to it to the Hindutva ideology. They believe that Indian politics is being imported to the city, but thus far the BBC has found no direct link to such groups in the run-up to the disorder"
While this story is not inaccurate, it does leave out a few things for some reason.
First, it rightly traces the issue back to the scuffle post the cricket match, but what it somehow omits is the attacks on the homes of Indian families after that. (On video, arrests were made)
It rightly focused on the families leaving part, which to be fair wasn't confirmed by anyone credible. But it focuses too much on some fake Twitter accs tweeting on it, while mentioning the temple attack in passing, and totally ignoring the burning of the sacred flag by the mob.