And US demographics reflect that. As OP notes, this was his maternal line.
Since this is twitter, to reiterate: this is about the many poor white women who _didn't own people_ preferring Indigenous &/or enslaved Black men, bc they were often better providers than poor white men.
Some slaveowning plantation mistresses forced enslaved men into sex, which is very very bad.
AND broke white women traded sex for hominy, venison, & food enslaved people grew in their own gardens.
That hurts nobody. But it's so scary to white supremacists that it impacted laws.
Needless to say, "some poor white women might prefer men of color over white men for totally valid economic (and let's be real, probably personality) reasons" really didn't sit well with the white men!
It actually explains a lot about US: things like the one-drop rule, anti-miscegenation laws, residential segregation, etc.
Not to get out of pocket here but it also probably helps explain some elements of race play. : /
some people will literally invent a racist fetish & keep it going for decades/centuries after the conditions that created it
rather than fix their economy, pass civil rights, or go to therapy
Anyway if you want more on how poor white women didn't automatically prefer white men during the slavery era, and how that made white men ~panique~, once again Masterless Men by @KeriLeighMerrit is a great resource.
This is all to say that the idea that poor white southerners have some kind of Racism Gene that is simply missing from better, more enlightened whites
is WILDLY out of touch with how actual people have lived their lives in real-life US history.
Like. If poor whites already hated Black people so much, why did the South's ruling class decide they needed segregation laws
I simply suspect, based on the society they built, that the white men of the antebellum south had some IMMACULATE neuroses, narcissistic tendencies, and control issues
you can't blame a bitch for deciding to steer clear of that
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The coverage on banks rhymes a LOT with the wheat panic a year ago.
Turned out to be baseless for most of the people doing the panicking. Driven by a combo of speculators & clickbait journalism, egging on panic for personal gain.
I'm not a finance expert. And neither are most of the people losing their shit about banks rn.
People w experience in bank regulation, & the standard wind-down process when one fails, are not running around with their hair on fire yelling about how the sky is falling.
That's mostly........certain tech VCs.
I don't know how to say this if y'all don't already know. But that industry isn't exactly famous for sober understanding or management of real-world risk.
every week a new reporter discovers that rich white people like to play militant land pirate & thinks it's a brand new phenomenon that just got invented
I'm always curious what they think the USA has been about for the last 250+ years
Is there a way to search for medical practices that take your insurance and not your social security number
Hello & welcome to data breach hell
Update: found a clinic apparently modeled on an Army field hospital
it's dark, dingy, a health info poster on the wall is gently splattered with what I hope is iodine, they're efficient & do not ask for personal info beyond what is medically necessary to treat you