Neuroticism is a puzzle for evolution. Worrying seems to be pretty bad for humans! Studies have linked it to lots of bad outcomes. But neuroticism is a good early warning alert! 🚨 New study found neurotic areas of Germany suffered fewer Covid cases.
Openness to experience was the opposite, at least in the US. Open-minded regions got hit harder at first. Could be all because openness entails more social mixing, more travel.
But here's the twist: The harm of openness switched off after a few months. By September 2020, open-minded places in the US had FEWER cases on average. Upsides of open-mindedness could be openness to masks, Zoom, and other adjustments.
This data shows how the effects of culture can *differ* over time--even in a few months.
There's a great example in a study of cell phone mobility data around the world. High relational mobility cultures like to mix socially. But the most mobile cultures CUT their social ties more than low-mobility cultures.
In my recent study, I also found that cultural effects changed over time. Relational mobility was really bad for Covid at first, but it actually turned slightly helpful after October 2020.
Cultures aren't static. Their effects depend on circumstances, like how aware people were of the danger of Covid. I love seeing data like this that breaks out effects over time. 👍
Last and least, my own study on relational mobility, tightness, rice, and Covid (free download on my SSRN page). Hat tip to CS Lee, @AlexEngPsych, and Shuang Wang. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New paper out! I was in China when COVID-19 broke out, and I was dumb enough to walk counting how many people were wearing masks.
With a research team, we observed 1,300 people in seven cities in a radius around Wuhan.
Cases got really bad. Cities locked down. But that was later! These were the EARLY, ambiguous days--before people knew whether this was a real threat or needless panic. The US @Surgeon_General was still telling people masks don't work.
New paper just out in PNAS! Rice-farming societies have tighter social norms than wheat-farming and herding societies. Open access: pnas.org/content/early/…
Why? Rice farmers shared labor and faced commons problems with shared irrigation networks. Strong social norms helped farmers coordinate labor, water, repairing channels.
Using survey data from ~11,000 people across China, historical rice farming predicted tighter social norms in the present day. China is a great place to test the effect of rice because it has rice and wheat areas with similar ethnicity, religion, government, etc.