April 6th, 2023: @Twitter has been randomly shutting down API access for many apps and sadly we were affected today too. Hopefully we will be restored soon! We appreciate your patience until then.
(thread) This Pence development today is significant and potentially historic. A former vice president is now willing, within certain specified constitutional grounds his lawyers fought to arrange, to testify about potential illegal acts by a president. cbsnews.com/news/mike-penc…
Trump's lawyers might try to appeal Pence's decision, but they keep losing efforts to assert exec. priv. with this grand jury.
That means Pence could appear before Jan. 6 grand jury in the coming weeks to testify under oath about what exactly Trump did and said in private.
Think about what this means. The special counsel could now get a first-hand account of what Trump specifically said to Pence in Oval Office meetings ahead of Jan. 6, as long as Pence and his lawyers do not consider those conversations related to his specific constitutional role.
Pence has long been reluctant to talk at all, even to confidants, about what Trump has said to him in private. Pence has protected his confidence with Trump for years. But he is also someone who knows a subpoena to testify is what it is: a demand to follow the rule of law.
Pence's spokesman's statement today underscores that he will follow the rule of law. A sign of where he stands, how he'll handle. So as long as special counsel asks questions that are arguably outside realm of "President of Senate" hat Pence wore as VP, testimony seems possible.
Here are some looming questions...
On Jan. 4, 2021, John Eastman pressured you to act, to your face, in the Oval. What did he say? What did Trump say? How did they follow up? Did you take it as a directive or a suggestion on how to handle your job as vice president?
A day later, on Jan. 5, 2021, President Trump called you into the Oval Office to talk, one on one. What exactly did he say to you? What did he say about his desire to stay in power? What did he outline as his hopes for Jan. 6? Did he give you any documents?
Late on Jan. 5, 2021, you return home to dinner. A group dinner, some supporters there. Friends. Did anyone else call you that night? Or reach out to your advisers? The next morning, Jan. 6, you stay home and don't go to the White House. Take me through that decision and moment.
On the morning of Jan. 6, you take a call with Trump. What did you say to him when he berated you for not doing his bidding? Who else did you speak with that morning ahead of issuing your letter and going to the Capitol?
All that is during his time as VP of the United States, not as "president of Senate." But will be up to a judge to ultimately decide, should Pence testify as now expected, about just how far the special counsel can go in terms of the scope of questions on Trump's conduct.
What will matter is whether special counsel can eventually prove criminal intent on Trump's part (or Eastman, Giuliani, etc.) to conspire to block a congressional proceeding... sources tell me that's a key focus in the Jan. 6 probe: How did Trump use his power to block Congress?
This all comes as the special counsel is also, I'm told, digging very deep into whether Trump in any way tried to obstruct the government from securing classified documents, securing testimony from tons of aides, Mar-a-Lago employees and even Trump's own lawyer...
So, yes, yesterday in NYC was historic. A surreal American scene. But the real movement, perhaps, is in Washington. In Jack Smith's special counsel investigations. Fast-moving probes, witnesses being compelled to come in. And a former VP now set to testify under oath. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An indictment of Trump possible in coming days, but grand jury was not convened today, making ETA of a vote on Trump indictment TBD. Not clear what is delaying DA Bragg, if anything, or if more witnesses will be called.
2. Federal grand jury on Trump's classified documents, special counsel
Trump's lawyer in the case, Evan Corcoran, has been ordered by an appeals court to provide any evidence about Trump's handling of records, notes of mtgs., audio files, etc. And to testify about all the above.
3. Federal grand jury investigating Jan. 6 and conduct of Trump/his allies
Fmr VP Pence's lawyers could appear before judge as soon as Thurs. over his subpoena. Pence team willing to fight it to SCOTUS on constitutional grounds. Pence had 1-on-1 chats w/ Trump ahead of Jan. 6.
Former ambassador @NikkiHaley in snowy Nevada, Iowa tonight. Starts speech by talking up @IowaStateU basketball team’s latest victory and her bio. Tells crowd she grew up near farms, didn’t go to Ivy League, was outsider in SC GOP before being elected governor…
Haley is not running against Trump. Or DeSantis. Or anyone. Talking up rec, nodding twd some policy stances (broadly hawkish on foreign policy but also a bit 'America First' in rhetoric) and traditional GOP on fiscal policy, calling for some changes to long term fed spending...
Tonight is first time since her announcement, which I covered in C'ton, that I've seen Haley on the trail. Town-hall setting. Trumpism influence seen in how she talks about other nations (confrontational, same way she talks about SC GOP foes). But doesn't lean into nationalism.
As several observers have noted today, there are various ways the Pence subpoena issue could play out in court. Trump side raises privlege questions, which special counsel is taking steps to address and prompt Pence to testify. But Pence lawyer Emmet Flood's "speech & debate" ...
argument looms over a possible Pence appearance and could lead to more deliberation over the scope of questioning, particularly regarding Jan. 6/congressional certification-related questions.
As @hugolowell first noted, Pence has yet to make an appearance so what's unfolding is a preliminary attempt by the special counsel to compel Pence to testify.
BREAKING NEWS: In recent days, federal prosecutors have asked the chief judge in Washington, D.C.’s federal court to compel former Vice President Mike Pence to comply with a grand jury subpoena and testify as a witness in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation...
Per 3 people familiar with the investigation, the motion to compel Pence’s testimony – filed in secret to Chief Judge Beryl Howell in recent days – came after lawyers for former President Donald Trump asserted executive privilege in response to Pence’s subpoena... w/ @RobLegare
FYI: The motion to compel filed by the special counsel's office is the logical next step in a criminal probe, with prosecutors seeking force a witness or third party to comply with a grand jury subpoena. It asks the court to uphold the subpoena’s legal authority.
Good morning from outside the Fulton County courthouse, awaiting the special grand jury’s report on Trump and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election… due to a judge’s order, we expect a partial release of the report today @CBSNews
In filing today, Fulton County (Ga.) special grand jury report, partially released, reveals the grand jury has concluded "we find by a unanimous vote that no widespread fraud took place in the Georgia 2020 presidential election that could result in overturning that election."
Meanwhile, in partial release of report, special grand jury also states, "A majority of the Grand Jury believes that perjury may have been committed by one or more witnesses testifying before it... "
(thread) Good morning from Charleston. Covering Haley's first event as a 2024 candidate. Some notes from the notebooks over the years... I first interviewed her more than a decade ago, in 2010, as she was running for governor. That bid made her a party star. By the end of it...
she was being touted as a possible VP contender for the 2012 cycle. She was seen at the time as part of the tea-party movement, particularly b/c Palin endorsed her in May 2010, which generated a lot of news. But she notably never fully drifted from the Republican establishment...
she was at once someone who could tangle w/ legislature in SC and w/ Obama admin on Boeing and claim "anti-establ" cred as a conservative, all while maintaining ties to donor wing of the party. (She campaigned forcefully for Romney in 2012.) Ever avoiding being tied to one bloc.