April 6th, 2023: @Twitter has been randomly shutting down API access for many apps and sadly we were affected today too. Hopefully we will be restored soon! We appreciate your patience until then.
The *second* major conspirituality influencer that we've covered has now declared a primary challenge to Biden.
RFK Jr's conspirituality runs parallel to that of Marianne Williamson (the subject of our main feed episode today). /1
MW leans with full devotion into New Age Jesus as the source of her political teleology, her battle against dark psychic forces, and her belief that meditation can help ward off COVID. /2
RFK Jr. is more opportunistic, willing to marshal apocalyptic evangelicalism and ally with the Nation of Islam to electrify his paranoid pseudoscience. /3
Both code themselves as left-of-centre populists fighting government and corporate corruption and foreign policy hawks. So on the level of topline messaging they appear to move in a sane direction. But the fuel of that movement is hot garbage. /4
Williamson made her fortune teaching a pseudoscripture that encourages magical thinking and spiritual bypassing. #acim has served as the scriptural touchstone for New Age literature for decades, melting the brains of countless erstwhile progressives. /5
RFK Jr. has made a fortune in the antivax propaganda business. In 2020 he paid himself 345K as the chairman of Children's Health Defense, and his book-length slander of Anthony Fauci is expected to gross as much as 3.8M. /6
One platform issue makes RFK Jr a far worse Democratic spoiler than MW could ever be. While she advocates for slavery reparations and M4A, RFK Jr. cynically recruits Black influencers to his anti public health crusade by inappropriately exploiting tragedies like Tuskegee... /7
...while saying nothing about the universal health care that his uncle argued for in 1962 and that would be enshrined by the Black Panthers—who ran free community vaccine clinics—as a platform policy. We'll run RFK Jr's bullshit down in the main feed soon. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The unbearable need to endow with meaning and to forge biospiritual connections between tissues and issues.
I wonder if Sell realizes her correlations are culturally dependent. I'm not sure if she's taking these from German New Medicine, but in the Ayurvedic imaginary: /1
Bones = orderliness, paternal relationships, orientation to the Sun
Skin = regulation of fire and water elements, expression of Mercury
GI tract = desire, passion, leadership
Muscles = courage and work maintained by Saturn or the principle of binding /2
So how is the consumer of postmodern reconstructions of premodern health systems to choose which one is right for them? Answer: they have to get really good at the vibes check. /3
Anyone saying that #MarianneWilliamson's politics can be separated from her religious commitments is being naive.
Understanding where she's coming from spiritually is essential to assessing the calculus of what she says vs. what she believes vs. what she would do. /1
Bits like this made MW stand out in the summer of 2019 because they were disruptive to the typical discourse, and they grounded her brand in outsidership.
But they also revealed Williamson’s real career as a spiritual influencer. They pointed at her sources. /2
If you listen closely, you can hear echoes of #ACourseinMiracles, the New Age Bible that MW has been meditating on every day since 1977, and lecturing from since 1983.
As #MarianneWilliamson implies in her damage control statement on the Politico report, politics has plenty of bullies. But people should know that being a “tough boss lady,” as she euphemizes, may also be inspired by what an asshole her Jesus is—in A Course in Miracles. /1
Pious, condescending, and emotionally avoidant, the Jesus channeled by ACIM intones three continuous insults: 1) You are deluded about reality, 2) The absolute truth of My teachings is inescapable, and 3) Any resistance you have to Me is further delusion. Sound familiar? /2
The weird part? ACIM is a channeled text that demands the reader become its channel. The daily lessons are “written” by Jesus, but meant to be recited and meditated upon by the normal person, *as if they were Jesus.* Surprise: ACIM teachers struggle to not sound like assholes./3
Charismatic religious leaders can be hypocritical assholes regardless of their faith, and any faith can be used to rationalize or spiritualize abuse.
What makes NA charismatics different is that they operate almost entirely according to individualistic market principles. /2
There are NA economies and Oprah platforms and workshop circuits, but no functional communities with social history, experience in social justice or charitable work. Most NA philosophy piously sneers at worldly work. Their obsession is with the self-project. /3
Beau Brink (3): It kills me to think of little boys being told that they're not good enough, being bullied by other boys. It kills me to think of these children listening to Andrew Tate... /1
...and hearing him say that if you don't make enough money, you're not a good man. Or that if a woman has had multiple sexual partners, then she's not really a woman. You know, we have told cis people that they are not good enough, or enough of a man, or enough of a woman. /2
I want cis people to feel grounded in their identities, I don't want the realization that trans people exist to threaten cis people. I want it to empower them to define themselves and to stand in their truth and to have a really strong sense of who they are. /3
Recovering from a cult occurs on an arc. It’s easy to plateau or relapse. That happened to me in an embarrassing way: I was out of one high-demand group for only a month before being absorbed into a second high-demand group. But there are softer relapses as well. /1
The soft relapse is expressed by denouncing the abuses of the leader, while keeping their toxic worldviews, which are usually soft-fash or libertarian. Despising the leader might be necessary, but it’s a long step below rejecting the entire premise that captured you. /2
Maybe the soft-fash or libertarian politics of the group aligned with your values to begin with, and the problem you really have is that the leader abused people with ideas you like. You want to be free to practice them without his toxic influence. And you need friends. /3