Read on Twitter
Important point here, but worth adding that the first group (people with experience in NY criminal law who say the indictment is stronger) is functionally being erased from the discussion by pundits who, in their own echo chamber, refuse to engage with these experienced hands:
https://twitter.com/qjurecic/status/1643780828860653569
One more point to add to @qjurecic's tweet: The people who are "rushing to judgment" are those who are proclaiming the indictment a disaster before the tax piece is fully understood. Those who are urging caution and patience are *not* the ones rushing to judgment.
@qjurecic Finally, you don't get to piously pose as an Objective Seeker Of Truth Who Is Bravely Bucking The Mob if you simply refuse to listen to the voices of those with experience in these matters.
Final final thought: We all know how the pundit game works. Incentives are strong to call something early/then be right. But everyone knows there's no penalty for getting it wrong if you initially "bucked your own side" etc. It's not brave! There's no need to call this one early!
I don't understand how anyone can read this good thread and then turn around and state with a straight face that they *now* know enough to pass judgment on the indictment:
https://twitter.com/lee_kovarsky/status/1643707587420979203
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
