April 6th, 2023: @Twitter has been randomly shutting down API access for many apps and sadly we were affected today too. Hopefully we will be restored soon! We appreciate your patience until then.
And now that they're about to cross 1M inscriptions (yes, actually) you're scrambling to get up to speed?
Don't worry, I gotchu.
Behold – the definitive Ordinals megathread 🧵
1/57
This thread will cover:
1. What the heck are Ordinals and why now? 2. Market structure & trading 3. Who are the top dogs so far? 4. Competing Bitcoin NFTs (@Stacks, Stamps) 5. The future
There's a surprise waiting for readers who make it to the end – so let's jump in!
2/57
Ordinals. Inscriptions. Bitcoin NFTs. Do these all mean the same thing?
No.
These are actually separate but related concepts, nested within each other.
Confused?
Let's break it down.
3/57
Let's start with Ordinals.
Ordinal Theory was developed by @rodarmor as an off-chain arbitrary method to track Satoshis.
Remember: each Bitcoin has 100M Satoshis.
There are ~1.9 quadrillion Satoshis in existence today and there will be ~2.1 quadrillion eventual supply.
4/57
Satoshis (sats) are inherently fungible. They're just the smallest denomination of Bitcoin, like a penny is to the $.
But what if there was a method to distinguish one sat from another?
Suddenly – sats become NON-fungible.
This is what Ordinal Theory accomplishes.
5/57
Ordinal Theory prescribes a serial number to every sat in existence based on the order it was mined.
If you subscribe to this ordering regime, you might value formerly fungible sats differently now.
For ex, older sats, or sats with unique serial #'s, may be worth more.
6/57
Ordinal Theory actually proposes a rarity system – it's quite interesting and I encourage you to check it out.
Uncommon Sats (~745K exist today) are trading OTC at .125BTC ($3,500!) per sat.
If you own BTC, you might unknowingly even have some in your wallet.
So we've established that satoshis can now be fungible.
In some sense, they're already NFTs – they're collectible, they're historical, and people might want to own certain sats.
But there's no metadata attached to them...yet.
And we all know JPEGs are what make NFTs fun.
8/57
Enter Inscriptions – the term that describes an Ordinal inscribed (permanently imbued) with arbitrary metadata.
Inscriptions were technically feasible in the past, but there were two issues:
1) Data inscription was VERY costly 2) There was no way to track sats
9/57
#2 has been solved by Ordinals.
What solved #1?
The SegWit (2017) and Taproot (2021) upgrades to the BTC network.
This can get a whole lot more technical, so I'll keep it high-level.
10/57
SegWit separated essential block data (expensive) from witness data (cheap). Witness data receives a 75% discount on byte storage.
The Taproot upgrade inadvertently removed data limits in the witness section of a block.
Together...
11/57
...one could now insert arbitrary metadata, at a much lower cost than normal transaction data, into the witness (signature) section of BTC transactions.
Thus giving rise to Inscriptions – aka Ordinals *inscribed* with metadata using this novel method.
12/57
The astute reader probably stops here and asks:
"Ok hold up here man...who decided this Ordinal system is the one we should go with anyways!?"
And it's a great question.
Why are we using this numbering system instead of a different one?
13/57
Anyone could have devised a protocol for tracking satoshis based on any number of factors.
The simple answer: Ordinal Theory has achieved social consensus. It came at the right time.
Why now?
14/57
It's no coincidence that Ordinals have achieved escape velocity at the exact time the immutability of NFTs on other blockchains have come into question.
For example – projects on ETH are now contemplating contract migration to enforce royalties.
People are becoming acutely aware of the mutability of NFTs on smart contract chains.
Put simply – what you bought today, might be different from what you own tomorrow.
With Ordinals, what you buy will ALWAYS be precisely what you own.
16/57
This concept is referred to as a digital artifact.
Ordinals are digital artifacts. Inscriptions are digital artifacts.
But not all Bitcoin NFTs are digital artifacts. For example, NFTs created on a Bitcoin smart contract L2 are NOT digital artifacts (more on this later).
17/57
The core innovation of Ordinals/Inscriptions is that you now have digital artifacts, for the first time ever, on the oldest and most secure blockchain in the world.
Owning an Ordinal is owning a piece of on-chain history and culture.
Forever.
18/57
Now that all the conceptual groundwork is laid down, let's get into the practicals of the market.
I'll go through:
1) What is the current activity level in Ordinals? 2) Where do they trade? 3) Is there any material volume or is it all a fugazi? 4) Brief note on infra
19/57
Since Ordinals protocol was released on Jan 31st, there has been over 900K inscriptions and $4.5M (160BTC) in fees paid to miners.
Significant advances in infra have accelerated the pace of new inscriptions.
While any content can be inscribed, the majority are images.
20/57
In the early days, Inscriptions required running a full BTC node + Ord client. This involved a full download of the network (~450GB) and technical chops.
Today, there are tons of no-code inscription services. To name a few:
Bitcoin Stamps created by @mikeinspace is a new method of inscribing into the essential node data. Your NFTs now live on the trunk of Bitcoin, not its branches.
So in some sense, these stamps are more permanent than Ordinals (it's up for debate if this actually matters).
To close out, where will the future of Ordinals go and how large of a market could this grow to be?
@glxyresearch sees between $1.5 – 4.5bn TAM within the next 2 years.
This is based on market cap comparisons to various Ethereum NFT verticals.
47/57
I think this is overall reasonable but adoption will hinge on several factors:
1. Rapid buildout of infra for seamless UI/UX and onboarding 2. Continued innovation on the creative project side 3. Establishing dominance over the Bitcoin culture war
#3 is interesting...
48/57
SegWit/Taproot were never intended to house cryptopunks in witness data.
Bitcoin maxis are furious at Ordinals – a movement they view as defiling sacred block space.
Yet here we are.
49/57
In some ways, Ordinals may have saved Bitcoin.
Because it is far more expensive to pay miners to inscribe data compared to an ordinary BTC transaction, inscribers set a floor for block space and thus network fees.
It's unlikely maximalists will see it that way.
50/57
Could Bitcoin devs implement a fork of the network?
Yes. It's possible.
However, it wouldn't stop inscriptions altogether – it would just make them more costly if the exploits for cheaper on-chain data storage go away.
Ordinals are here to stay in some form or another.
51/57
To recap this behemoth thread:
1. Ordinals/Inscriptions/BTC NFTs are all not the same 2. Ordinals = numbering system. Inscriptions = permanent data storage within Ordinal satoshis 3. Together – these are BTC-native digital artifacts
(cont.)
52/57
4. While it's easy to inscribe now, it wasn't always the case 5. Infra around marketplaces, IaaS, wallets, and explorers is moving fast 6. Majority of trading is taking place on trustless exchanges now but lengthy settlement is still an issue
(cont.)
53/57
7. Ordinals have achieved real volume in a short lifespan 8. A handful of projects have cemented blue-chip status already but more quality launches are coming 9. The market so far has a preference for L1 Ordinals over L2 BTC NFTs. BTC Stamps may have legs as an alternative
54/57
10. Above all else, Ordinals are bringing fun back to Bitcoin.
They're culture, history, and digital artifacts all wrapped into one and on the oldest blockchain in the world.
It's worth getting fired up over.
55/57
Congrats if you made it to the end of this absolutely massive thread!
I invite you to mint my very own custom Metaveralist Badge: a free mint on Polygon.
@HelloMetaversal and myself will be giving out perks in the future for badge holders.
Or stroke of genius waiting to be recognized by the market?
A mega 🧵 on the biggest $16.5M splash into Bitcoin Ordinals by far: @yugalabs TwelveFold
1/ In this thread, I'll cover:
1) Brief intro to Ordinals 2) What is TwelveFold? 3) How the TwelveFold auction went down 4) The reveal aftermath 5) Current market 5) The future: how TwelveFold may play out
Let's jump in!
2/ First, what are Ordinals and why is Yuga interested in them?
Ordinal Theory is a set of rules to 'order' specific Bitcoins and thus allow them to be encoded with up to 4MB of metadata.
This opened the door to "Bitcoin NFTs" – specific Bitcoins with content attached to them.
1. Traders getting PAID to borrow on @BendDAO 2. @blur_io distortionary incentives creating artificial bid depth from only ~500 whales 3. Tenuous macro still in play (no new fiat buyers)
Why this won't end well 🧵
1/ We're seeing the confluence of DeFi x NFTs taken to its logical extreme.
NFTs are mere chips at the casino table.
When NFTs get treated as fungibles, weird stuff starts to happen. Because they're far less liquid, the market has trouble with pricing and absorbing volatility.
2/ NFT backed debt is a great way to massage liquidity into markets.
But not all debt is created equal when it comes to risk.
Borrowing incentives work like a rubber band. As it gets stretched further and further, the inevitable whipsaw back to equilibrium is quick and violent.
The current game publishing model is ripe for disruption.
Historically, new mediums of distribution, monetization, and creation have taken gaming by storm (arcades -> consoles/PC -> mobile; paid -> F2P).
Why Web3 could be the "arcade" disruption moment for game publishers 🧵
1/ Firstly, what's wrong with the existing publishing model?
1. Massive upfront $ for unclear payoff years later 2. Difficult to build community during dev 3. Short LTV necessitates player extraction (micro transactions)
See: the most downvoted @Reddit comment of all time
2/ The current model sucks for players and devs too.
Devs: 1. No user feedback for years; iterating in the dark 2. Dependent on the publisher for marketing and community growth
Players: 1. Can't play the game for years 2. Devoted apostles have no way to being rewarded
2/ In this piece, I give a non-technical introduction to NFT lending suitable for the curious but uninitiated NFT aficionado.
I'll cover:
1. Why NFT lending is inevitable 2. The current lay of the land for lending 3. What can go wrong 4. Where the puck is headed
3/ We at @HelloMetaversal strongly believe NFT lending is inevitable.
The reason is simple: debt makes NFTs FAR more productive. Some amount of debt, done in the right way, unlocks a massive amount of $ for other productive uses.