On the unregulated set of a YouTube channel with more than 10 million subscribers — one you've probably never heard of — 11 teen plaintiffs allege shocking abuse. The channel makes millions of dollars by entertaining young children. From me + @KalhanRnbcnews.com/pop-culture/ce…
On Piper Rockelle's channel, videos with millions of views depict children engaging in what many adults characterize as age-inappropriate skits, which parents say the kids and their viewers didn't understand was supposed to be fake — leading to trauma, harassment, and bullying.
Many of the children who performed with Piper had worked on real TV and movie sets before, but in YouTube’s Hollywood, there are no rules or regulations. Parents said Tiffany Smith, Piper’s mom, abused their kids under her “care and control.”
These are just some of the claims of sexual abuse, which are very difficult to read. Tiffany Smith denies the claims. This is what children say happens to them in the Wild West of YouTube stardom.
But wait, there's more. After leaving Piper's "Squad," the plaintiffs say their own YouTube revenue on their own channels plummeted. They accuse Tiffany Smith and her boyfriend Hunter Hill of various methods of sabotaging the kids' YouTube channels. This is dystopian stuff.
If you have heard of Piper Rockelle before, it’s probably because of this @Pink tweet from 2021. I’ve been following this harrowing story ever since. It involves various defamation lawsuits spanning years, the stars of the OG TikTok, Musical.ly, and even the FBI.
But what's missing from the story is accountability. Back in Sept 2021, after the P!nk tweet, @kieranpressreyn and I started requesting comment from YouTube. First, they took down three of Piper's thumbnails for violating their child safety policy. insider.com/piper-rockelle…
You may be wondering, "Hm, if YouTube recognizes elements of this channel violate child safety, shouldn't they take further action?" Well, you'd be wrong. It took the current lawsuit being sent to YouTube for them to demonetize Piper's channel. insider.com/youtube-piper-…
Oh, and Piper's channel? It's still up, she's still churning out videos featuring other kids, she's selling merch and touring the country, and Tiffany Smith said she has obtained a permit to work with children in California. (h/t @AmyKinLA and the LA Times, story linked in ours)
This is a civil case, so it won't impact the status quo in YouTube by itself. I talked to the brilliant @CatalinaGoanta about the much wider global landscape of child influencers and the implications of various cases over the past 10 years.
Here is the full complaint for today's case detailing all of the most current allegations: dhillonlaw.com/wp-content/upl…
Our story is just the tip of the iceberg — not just for Tiffany Smith's YouTube operation, but for the entire platform and how it enables the monetization of child abuse. nbcnews.com/pop-culture/ce…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Drake Bell came forward as a child sexual abuse victim in "Quiet on Set." He has also pleaded guilty to crimes against children. But Bell's supporters have attacked his victim and his other accusers, editing court footage for TikTok and sending vile DMs. nbcnews.com/tech/internet/…
It's the latest iteration of a gendered pattern in abuse cases that attract wide public interest: female victims and accusers are harassed, undermined, and abused online. Male victims like Bell who then perpetuate a cycle of abuse are excused and defended. nbcnews.com/tech/internet/…
For Passionfruit, @IAmAsarch found that Bell is using the platform and success of “Quiet on Set” to shift the narrative in his favor, against his victim and accusers. Bell has been promoting conspiracy YouTube videos that claim he was falsely accused. passionfru.it/drake-bell-mat…
Excellent piece from @linzasaur about how the UK hopes to combat Andrew Tate’s influence over young boys and men, and how their plan is doomed to fail unless US social media companies change the way their platforms incentivize Tate’s behavior. businessinsider.com/plan-to-combat…
I believe any plan to combat Tate is five years too late at least. We can still do something, and doing ANYTHING would be better than the nothing we typically encounter, but an entire generation of men and boys has already been influenced into violent anti-women extremism.
Another great thing about @linzasaur’s piece is that it gets into the WHY of Andrew Tate’s influence. As conditions worsen for these boys and men, Tate feeds them a false worldview of female supremacy they have to fight. It’s not true and it never was. businessinsider.com/plan-to-combat…
Russell Brand’s “mainstream media bias” angle is the opposite of what the allegations against him suggest — that mainstream media, which he was enormously successful in, was an enabler in the behavior described by at least five women. thetimes.co.uk/article/russel…
During Brand’s early years on Channel 4, staff alleged Brand asked them to find young female audiences members for him to meet after filming. They allege concerns about this practice were dismissed with “Boys will be boys” rhetoric.
Two former personal assistants who worked for Brand during his mainstream media success said his managers sought them out specifically because they were gay or Brand’s mother’s age — in part because Brand walked around in his underwear or with no underwear.
Three reporters and outlets, years of reporting, and hundreds of sources went into this Russell Brand investigation — one woman alleged he had a 3-month relationship with her when she was 16 and displayed increasingly abusive behavior. thetimes.co.uk/article/russel…
The woman said when she was 16 a taxi driver begged her not to go into Brand’s house after learning her age. The woman said Brand had her change his name to a woman’s name in her phone to deceive her parents. She said he sexually assaulted her.
The woman said Brand also kissed her mother without consent after her mother dropped her off, leaving her mother “very upset” and pleading for her daughter to come home. The woman hopes the age of consent law can be changed from 16 to 18
“I could never be convinced to join a cult” and “I can spot a manipulator a mile away” and “I could never be abused” are all variations of the same wrong sentiment. Your false belief that you are above manipulation and abuse stems from victim-blaming culture.
Part of the reason this sentiment irks me so much it that it’s based around the fallacy that life is predictive. Even the most psychologically well-adjusted and skeptical person is suspectible to life-altering events and changes that could leave them vulnerable to abuse.
The idea that only stupid, careless, and naive people are abused or recruited into cults or manipulated relies on myths about victimization. Even if you are not vulnerable right now, you were as a child, you will be as an elder, and everything can change in an instant.