Fox News deserves the fine (it should be higher, IMO), obviously. But will making it expensive to lie deter powerful media corporations like Fox from lying? I don’t think so, because lying *is* the business plan — not a deviation from the plan. It’s how they make their money. 1/
Fox News will continue to lie. If needed, they’ll get more creative about how they lie, but they won’t stop lying.
Today’s fine is essentially a lying tax — for them, it’s just the cost of doing business. Their business is not “news with some lies.” Their business is lying. 2/
Fox News can eat this fine. They’d rather not, sure, but it’s not going to bankrupt them. This isn’t even the first time Fox News has reached a settlement with someone who suffered harm due to their lies. And the last one changed … nothing. 3/ npr.org/2022/06/15/110…
Alex Jones was ordered to pay **half a billion dollars** for his Sandy Hook lies, and it had no observable effect on the media ecosystem, despite putting a VERY high price on lying. The problem is that the profit from lying is even higher than the price. 4/
Think of a bar that suddenly has to pay an alcohol tax for the first time. The bar owner is not going to be deterred from selling alcohol just because there’s a tax on it. Bars are in the alcohol business; without alcohol, there is no bar.
Fox is in the lying business. 5/
The deterrence model just doesn’t work with Fox News. If Fox stops lying, they will cease to be Fox — and even if they have to pay a massive lying tax, they know they’ll make up for it in profit. By lying. 6/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s always seemed strange to me how quickly “Havana Syndrome” was dismissed. Like, you’ve got a group of people who have been deemed trustworthy enough to perform our nation’s most sensitive work, but now they’re not credible because they have symptoms that we don’t understand?
This seems to say a lot more about us than it does about them. We aren’t good at dealing with uncertainties, and we are uniquely bad at believing people when they experience symptoms — including ones that are objectively verifiable — that don’t fit neatly into a diagnostic box.
I used to study medically unexplained symptoms, and the experiences of patients who had them. It’s just widespread, systemic institutional betrayal, and a lot of them walk away with a form of trauma (betrayal trauma) b/c of how they’re treated.
This is WILD. Two men were just charged with operating an illegal overseas "police station" in NYC — the 1st ever in the US — on behalf of the Chinese govt, and using it to spy on, co-opt or intimidate Chinese dissidents living in the city and elsewhere. nbcnewyork.com/news/local/cri…
Also facing charges are *34* police officers from China's Ministry of Public Security (MPS) who belong to a task force called the "912 Special Project Working Group."
They are accused of conspiracy to transmit interstate threats & conspiracy to commit interstate harassment.
The charges announced today reveal new details about China’s use of fake online personas to spread Chinese govt propaganda, carry out coordinated harassment, and threaten dissidents & activists around the world, including in NYC. foxnews.com/politics/two-n…
Tucker Carlson circulated fake versions of the leaked documents when he cited the false casualty figures for Ukraine. Those documents were circulating on pro-Russia Telegram channels before Tucker pushed them on his show.
Are we cracking open the Kremlin to Tucker pipeline?
How Tucker Carlson keeps introducing Russian propaganda to American audiences is a question I have been asking for a long time, and it would be hugely important if this case helps us figure it out.
Russian operatives are bragging about becoming more effective at manipulating social media without being detected. Meanwhile, Elon Musk, Matt Taibbi, et al would like you to believe that the real problem is that we’re trying to do something about it. washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
“As the war in Ukraine unfolds, Russian propaganda about the conflict has gotten a boost from a friendly source: government officials and state media out of Beijing.” brookings.edu/research/winni…
I can’t sleep, so I’m writing, & one of the thoughts that keeps popping up is that I feel there’s a fundamental disconnect between what people think disinformation researchers do vs what disinfo researchers actually do.
Studying disinfo isn’t about telling people what to do. 1/
Studying disinformation is about helping people make sense of the world. It’s about helping people navigate hazards & shining a light on hidden areas; it’s about trying to help people be aware of biases & blindspots, media effects, deception tactics, social/group dynamics, etc 2/
And just as importantly, it’s about realizing that we are susceptible to all of the same biases & blindspots as anyone else. Disinfo researchers get it wrong sometimes, get caught up in groupthink & social pressure sometimes, & absolutely experience cognitive overload. 3/