Cop city isn’t complicated. I’ve given plenty of opportunity for folks to reach out and no one has provided adequate answers for our questions. The simple reality is the community around the forest want the area cleaned up and developed *as they were promised in 2017.* 1/ #GAPol
They’re now being told the only way for that to happen is through cop city. It’s why I’ve found the most recent pr campaign offensive because it forces people to decide between a clean or disrupted community. This is an egregious bait and switch. People aren’t stupid. 2/
And, with the recent news about ruling Tortuguita’s death a homicide, I’ve lost all ability to grant any grace or benefit of the doubt on this issue. Cop city cannot be built because we’ve been shown time and again that communities are being lied to. 3/
And to those who say “if we want less bad behavior we need to train law enforcement more” I remind you that one of the core tenants of effective training is a system of consequences should that training not be followed. That system of consequences does not exist. 4/
The entire method with which cop city is being forced down the throats of everyone proves that there is no accountability. Nothing about the project was done right. And I’m tired of watching promises made to get people to acquiesce only for those promises to be broken. 5/
I’ve been against cop city from the beginning because I’ve watched this film before. Every time we’re told these projects mean affordable housing/cleaner community/less crime we end up with the total opposite. 6/
With everything that’s come out on this, I’m left wondering, WHY is so much political capital and public resources being used to justify this project? Well, I can’t wait to get those answers. And, I know we will. 7/
In the meantime, I pray that folks who have the power to stop this break through their information bubbles sooner rather than later and hear what those outside those bubbles are saying. I promise you, it’s not complicated. 8/
How does this not make everyone pause and question every piece of information briefed to them over the past few months? How does this not make you angry and think maybe it’s time to reconsider? 9/
I remember running into @royceforatlanta right after this happened. He looked visibly shaken and I thought it was due to the SB140 hearing. He then relayed to me what happened. When I went to the desk an hour later after my meeting to ask the officers, no one denied it. 1/
When I spoke to the officers at the desk (most of them weren’t there during the incident) I mentioned that I just wanted to talk about the incident to remind them this is a very public space. One of them towered over me to tell me he’s the supervisor and began questioning me. 2/
He wanted to know if I knew the names of the officers. Thankfully, someone else was there and let him know some of the names. Another officer confirmed the conversation. There was no remorse. Instead the supervisor shifted to immediately trying to intimidate me. 3/
There’s government light blue check marks apparently but I guess local government doesn’t count. Big yikes.
For the record, my team and I will not pay for verification. It defeats the whole purpose. Our handle is ruwa4georgia everywhere. Anything different is impersonation.
For those wondering why any of this matters other than an exercise in vanity: ever since I got elected we’ve seen multiple accounts pretending to be me on multiple platforms. Some accounts attempt to hack others by sending malicious links or ask for money to steal from people.
Without a system to truly verify who is real in a way other than who can pay the most, we increase the ability for bad actors to scam people. Not to mention it’ll make it much more difficult to identify what statements and posts are real.