He is the living symbol of the death of democracy. A free society can support a surprisingly high number of stupid people in important positions. It can at the same time support a similarly high number of evil people. What causes collapse is when people are both stupid AND evil.
This is the phenomenon I describe as #thickcuntocracy. Prominent positions in journalism (a vital component of a free society) and politics are captured by people who not only do active harm in those positions, but undermine the credibility of the institutional foundations.
No-one comes away from watching Dan Wootton thinking that OpEd and broadcast journalism are in a healthy state. So they might begin to turn away from credible sources of news media as well. And so the stupid and the evil corrode our society.
It’s a self-reinforcing exponential spiral, which is why things are so much worse and became so much worse so quickly since Brexit, the ultimate moment of triumph for the thick cunts. Thickcuntocracy has destroyed the Home Office, for example.
Suella Braverman represents a decline from Priti Patel (May and Rudd etc.) in that Patel’s Home Office was malign in its approach to immigration: (hostile environment, Windrush, etc.) but Braverman‘a goes one step further: it adds stupidity in following policies …,
… that cannot be anything other than counter-productive and failures on their own terms. And this doesn’t matter to her, because her entire political project has nothing to do with good government or public policy success; it begins and ends with culture war.
And that is why living in the thickcuntocracy is truly Kafkaesque. The state as machine lacking heart or brain; and so ultimately destroying both in the human beings fed into it to become components in a machine for human misery.
This argument Peter Hitchens is having with everyone, and indeed, reality and facts about Nazism, Communism and Socialism is, on the one hand, just standard tedious twitter boreathon bollocks, and on the other, so revealing of the right's current moral vacuum.
Hitchens is not stupid. He knows that the elimination of Bolshevism was as high a priority for the Nazis as the elimination of Jews. He knows that trade unionists, communists and socialists were some of the first people sent to the camps.
So why is it so important to him to twist the obvious around and make it face the opposite way? Because of what has happened to Conservatism. Hitchens has to find a way, intellectually, to reconcile himself to the reality that he and his are the Franz von Papens de nos jours.
In 1979, some bins weren't emptied for three weeks, and the right-wing press invented 'The Winter of Discontent', which took control of the political narrative, and helped give birth to the Thatcher revolution. The winter of discontent that is coming will be worse than anything
... seen since the end of the forties. It remains to be seen how that will filter into the story that guides the political nation's understanding of itself. It may well be that by then, the right wing press will do as they did with Blair, and switch allegiance.
However, it does feel that they are an even smaller, madder clique of fanatics than ever before. The histrionics about the possibility of a Labour government mean it will be quite the volte face. Back in the 80's and 90's, they pretended to be news outlets.
It's also part of the headache inducing merry-go-round of constant bad-faith accusations on both sides of the argument. It's an idiotic thing to say that this is 'about further stigmatising' trans people. Of course that's not what your opponents want. Fine to argue that this is
... an inescapable consequence of their argument if that's your position, but the people who disagree with you are not monsters! It's the same on the other side: people who want to improve life for trans people are not motivated by hatred of women. It's just nonsense.
Round and round it goes: 'TERF!' 'Rape-Apologist!' 'But slime-mould has 900 sexes!' 'The trans lobby want to erase lesbians from existence!' - it's all gibberish. And all the while, rape has been effectively legalised; the justice system a system of organised torture for women;
I spend my time here just wittering away, mainly in order to feel like I have a way to keep sane in a mad world. This is my most successful tweet, and I think it’s because people feel so gaslighted by the pretence that people like Harwood are journalists.
What people like him represent is anti-journalism. A deliberate attempt to misinform us to achieve a desired outcome. It’s a process that started in the UK and US under Bush and Blair with the systemic lying that pushed the Iraq invasion policy.
Blair, Campbell and others successfully transformed political journalists into courtiers in this country. It’s why the BBC is a shadow of its former self. In America; the New York Times eventually apologised to its readers for simply repeating lies told to it by the Government.
This comment is made in the context of the migration hysteria we have been in the grip of since 2005, the single greatest area of co-operation between right-wing politicians and campaigners and toxic media outlets. Brexit would have been impossible without it.
… but it applies to so very much of what is wrong with our media ecosystem today, from reporting on the environment, to the NHS. There’s not a single issue that hasn’t fallen prey to the collapse of journalism. That the BBC is captured is the worst. People misogynistically blame
… Laura Kuennsberg, but the truth is, it’s institutional. If it were about individuals, then the BBC would have been in more trouble when that foghorn of ignorance John Humphries was around. It isn’t about individuals, it’s about the very philosophy of journalism itself.
I disagree. I think Labour needs to set out the fact that the Tory Party has systematically attacked every area of public life in this country, from the top to the bottom. They need to link the attack on democracy, the rule of law and the Union to the cost of living crisis.
Both are as a result of allowing lies and populism to infect our public life through the media and corruption of our institutions. They have led to the normalising of electoral fraud, Jim Crow-style voter suppression, and we all pay the price when a self-perpetuating oligarchy
… is allowed to use the levers of power not to benefit the country, but to further its own self-interest. That damage ranges from the catastrophic Brexit settlement to the millions dependent on food banks, to the corruption of impartiality at the BBC to the collapse of the NHS.