2/ First, they were very underwhelming in terms of total job creation. The Treasury predicted that after five years they would have created 54,000 jobs. The actual figure was less than one third of this.
3/ Second, the majority of these jobs were in low skilled occupations. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing in itself. But they did not contribute to changing the make-up of a struggling economy – they brought in (a little) more of the same.
4/ Third, and reflecting their predecessors, they encouraged the displacement of jobs. Modest estimates are that 34% of the jobs ‘created’ were actually moved from elsewhere.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Mr Hunt added: “(#Teesside) is best example in the country of how if you have people who care about how businesses flourish you can really transform an area that has in the past been left behind.”
1/ I hope that this thread will highlight, in a very basic way, just some of the connections and interests between the IEA, Atlas, Cato, ExxonMobil, Charles Koch, Philip Morris, Chase Foundation, etc and their influence on the UK government over the last decade.
2/ The Atlas Network
The Atlas Network was founded by Antony Fisher in 1981. It is a non-profit organisation “supporting” over 450 free market and antiregulation organisations worldwide.
3/ Fisher also founded London’s Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) in 1995 after working with Austrian economist Friedrich Hayek at the Mont Pelerin Society (founded by Hayek and where Charles Koch was also a member), hence Atlas’s close connection with UK politics.