The craziest thing about the #BlockTheBlue effort and Twitter's counter-efforts is that it indicates "revenue from Twitter Blue users" really is Elon's only actual idea for the site to prosper.
And it's a *terrible* idea that will obvious fail.
They're somewhere around 600K Blue users. Call that 4.8M a month, ~57M a year in revenue.
Twitter's ad revenue is WAY down, advertisers are fleeing, Elon loaded the company with a mountain of debt... adding 57M in revenue from Blue is like spitting on a fire to put it out.
The fact that they're going so hard - banning 'block the blue' from trends, giving blue checks to people who don't want them, flunkies getting Very Mad at people who refuse to pay - means that there is no other idea. This is the whole thing, this was the genius plan. Astonishing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The most enraging part of the Left-NIMBY canon is the idea that new housing causes displacement.
It's NEW housing. By definition it is not displacing anyone!
In fact, displacement occurs when you fail to build housing!
The rent goes way up because you have tons of people chasing a limited number of units. Residents can't afford rent any longer and leave. New housing *prevents* displacement.
Some people live in a place. Others also want to live there. You have 3 basic options:
*Build more housing, all are welcome
*Don't build, rents rise, original residents get displaced
*Don't build, use a totalitarian hukou system of "The govt decides who is allowed to live here"
The Worst Tweets of 2022 competition has come down to this: our final two contestants.
I recorded a podcast with Vox's @rebexxxxa about the worst discourse of the year, this bracket, and why we can't get enough of social media trainwrecks. Check it out!