Read on Twitter
Let's unpack what's going on here.
1) #MattyDickPics is brushing off fact that Jim Jordan got misrepresenting a transcript, just like he got caught altering a Twitter Files screen cap.
2)@DavidSacks is treating #mattydickpics as a credible interlocutor even AFTER he got caught.
1) #MattyDickPics is brushing off fact that Jim Jordan got misrepresenting a transcript, just like he got caught altering a Twitter Files screen cap.
2)@DavidSacks is treating #mattydickpics as a credible interlocutor even AFTER he got caught.
3) BOTH of them, who've been blubbering about "free speech" nonstop for 6 months, are SQUEALING bc 50 private citizens wrote a letter and expressed an opinion for which they had lots of backing.
Again: These boys are SQUEALING bc people wrote a letter.
That's it. Wrote a letter
Again: These boys are SQUEALING bc people wrote a letter.
That's it. Wrote a letter
If you need any more proof neither of these boys gives a shit about free speech, there it is.
SQUEALING bc 50 private citizens expressed a well-substantiated opinion.
SQUEALING bc 50 private citizens expressed a well-substantiated opinion.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
