John Hayward Profile picture
Apr 25 12 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Of course "deplatforming works." Fascism works. Totalitarianism works. Terrorism works. That's why people keep embracing such ideologies, even though our culture nominally considers them to be among the greatest of human evils.
In short, FORCE works. Persuasion is difficult, frustrating, and often ineffective. Introducing any amount of force to a system founded on principles of liberty, self-government, individual choice, and private ownership of capital will inevitably tip the scales.
The generation that holds most of our political, corporate, and media power was taught all their lives that fascism is the ultimate evil - but they sank very easily into a fascist system. Today they quiver with glee at using combined state/corporate power to crush dissent.
Developing and using coercive power has a powerful allure. People who think they have great wisdom and absolute moral stature, who view themselves as messiahs on a mission with time running out, will never settle for force-free systems that require the consent of the governed.
"Democracy" is always a train they ride until they reach their ideological destination, and then they hop off and dynamite the train behind them. They think a free republic whose citizens can say "no" will never get important things done quickly enough. Only coercion "works."
Of course, all of these people will howl with outrage if force is used against THEM. It's not exactly hypocrisy - they think they have an exclusive right to employ compulsive tactics against the people. Every political actor that uses force believes they have a monopoly on it.
Remember back in the day when we always said we'd never negotiate with terrorists or make even small compromises with their demands? This attitude implicitly recognizes that terrorism is inherently effective. Reward it, even a little, and you'll get more of it.
Totalitarianism, the politicization of everything, is incredibly effective. It gives tiny political elites a method of imposing their ideology, morality, religion, and policies upon vast populations. Totalitarianism atomizes opposition by making dissidents feel isolated.
Fascism? That crap works GREAT. It fuses totalitarianism and authoritarianism, fuses the State with corporations. Fascism uses private capital to extend the power of the ruling Party BEYOND the authority of the government it controls, creating inescapable rigid conformity.
Fascism is evil and tends to be destroyed by the conflicts it creates to sustain the power of the ruling Party, but that process can take a long time. Fascism doesn't fail because it's ineffective. It would have no allure if it was weak.
We passed through an unfortunate period after the fall of the Soviet Union where we thought all the great evils - fascism, communism, totalitarianism - were self-evidently repulsive and foolish, so nobody would ever touch the stuff again. The End of History had arrived!
We were so naive to think that freedom could ever win a final victory. It's a never-ending battle. Liberty underestimated its adversaries. The Cold Warriors thought their children would avoid repeating the horrors of the 20th Century. We paid dearly for that mistake. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

Apr 26
A good education does many things: broadens intellectual horizons, instills a love of learning, teaches useful skills. One of the most important benefits is learning to communicate and cooperate with others - and here modern education is a dismal, deliberate failure.
Almost every detail of the degenerate modern curriculum is designed to make it harder for people to cooperate, trust each other, share a common culture, and even communicate on a meaningful level. That's what P.C. and wokeness are all about: atomizing us, destroying commonality.
We're taught that we can only trust the State, not each other. We have to police every word we say - or even think about, before speaking - or else the speech police will do it for us. We're taught systemic evil is everywhere, impossible for individuals to overcome.
Read 9 tweets
Apr 13
Only the totalitarian Party's preferred agenda counts as "action." If you do anything else - even if what you did actually addresses the problem, unlike the Party's purely symbolic demands - you have "done nothing."

Politics is religion to the Party, and gun control is a prayer.
Why is Lefty so opposed to school security? You'd think Democrats would rush to embrace another big spending opportunity, which they would of course immediately begin looting by adding thick layers of administrative flab, union jobs, etc. More spending on education!
There are two problems from the Democrat point of view. One is that school security would saddle the government with more responsibility, not just more power and money. It's a job that could be badly screwed up. Accountability would be demanded.
Read 17 tweets
Apr 12
For the Left, "democracy" means an anointed political elite acting as the Voice of the People and amassing unlimited power so they can Do What's Best For Everyone. Voting is a sideshow that exists only to give an illusion of legitimacy to the lust for power.
Notice how quickly the Left moves to bypass or dismantle any democratic institution that gets in its way. They'll say with a straight face that "democracy" can only be protected by reducing the number of issues people are allowed to vote on, let alone resolve without politics.
"Democracy" is basically a synonym for enlightened autocracy in their minds. Allowing citizens to vote against a growing list of "settled" issues is absurd to them. To be honest, they think you should only be allowed to vote for a narrow list of Party-approved candidates.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 4
The next GOP candidate for president must not only propose dramatic reforms, but convince a large number of cynical and dispirited voters that he or she can, and will, implement them. An oft-betrayed party won't surge behind someone who just SAYS the right things, not any more.
That's a pretty tall order. Even candidates that seem sincere about breaking down the Leviathan State are likely to be devoured by it, or crushed beneath its bulk. Fiery campaigners can easily be distracted or misled into irrelevance when they reach the Oval Office.
Underlying the various schisms in the GOP is the difficult problem that large groups of voters are convinced this or that candidate might talk a good game, but won't actually get things done, because they lack either the tremendous amount of will or skill necessary.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 4
What a sad irony that instead of liberating discourse, the Internet became the most powerful instrument of censorship and thought suppression ever devised.
Social media introduced entirely new ways to quash free expression, including stealth techniques like shadow bans and algorithms that can leave the victims unaware they have been suppressed or censored. Ideas are not only crushed by brute force, but assassinated from the shadows.
The Internet made it possible for organized networks of "amateur" censors - often small in number, but amplified by bot hordes - to manipulate algorithms and silence targeted individuals, while remaining largely anonymous themselves.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 3
The Great Reset vision of "democracy" with an authoritarian core includes a permanent bureaucracy, untouchable by voters, that has both the power and duty to override elections when the voters make an unacceptable choice.
Great Reset pseudo-democracy usually isn't upfront about what the unacceptable choices are, although we are coming closer to Iran-style "guardian councils" that will vet candidates and eliminate the "dangerous" ones before voters have anything to say about it.
Instead, the permanent core State takes action to disrupt and block the actions of unacceptable elected officials, working relentlessly to overturn elections by sabotage, inventing special new "rules" that only apply to certain representatives and agendas.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(