Thread: The Supreme Court is hearing a big case tomorrow. It should unite everyone: left, right & center. And the national press has almost totally ignored it.
It centers on an elderly woman who fell behind on her taxes. So the county took her home, sold it, and kept the profit.
Her name is Geraldine Tyler. After falling $2,300 behind on her property taxes, the county added $13,000 in penalties, interests & fees.
When she couldn't pay, they seized her condo—valued at $93,000—sold it for $40,000, and kept the leftover $25,000. reason.com/2023/04/25/rob…
The Supreme Court will decide if that's constitutional. It sounds like an easy case. But it has not been.
Multiple federal courts ruled against Geraldine, and said the government did nothing wrong by stealing her equity after it satisfied her debt. reason.com/2022/03/11/a-9…
Geraldine is far from the only victim. The stories are nauseating.
At 76 years old, Bennie Coleman lost his DC home over a $134 bill. The gov't sold the $197,000 house & kept the profit.
For months, Bennie slept on the porch—with dementia—thinking he'd locked himself out.
Then there's Tawanda Hall, who fell $900 behind on a property-tax payment plan for her Michigan home. After penalties, she owed $22,642.
The gov't seized her $300,000 house, sold it, and kept the profit.
Let me put this in perspective. In Michigan, defendants found guilty of stealing over $20,000 face a decade in prison.
When the government stole *10 times* that—leaving a mom and her kids completely bankrupt—it was all in a day's work.
Make it make sense.
This preys on the most vulnerable. And the gov't has gotten away with it, bc people don't know it's happening.
Well, people need to know. Because if it can happen to them, it can happen to you. SCOTUS should call it what it is: theft, plain & simple. /end reason.com/2023/04/25/rob…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is Linda Martin. A few years ago, the FBI seized her life savings: $40,200.
The kicker: She was never charged with a crime—and the government couldn’t tell her why it took her money.
Martin is far from the first. But she is trying to make sure she is the last. A thread.
In 2021, the FBI raided U.S. Private Vaults, a storage business in LA.
The company was suspected of criminal activity. But the warrant explicitly forbade agents from searching & seizing the contents of customers' boxes—like Linda Martin's.
Well... /2
The FBI violated the warrant (and the Constitution) & did so anyway.
Agents confiscated over $100 million in valuables using civil forfeiture, which allows the government to seize assets without having to prove its owners committed a crime.
This headline sounds peachy. The problem: It's completely deranged.
That's because most of these low-price cars—which Hawaii's govt is auctioning off—were seized by police from people who were never convicted of a crime.
In a sane world, that would be a scandal. A thread.
For those who are unfamiliar, civil forfeiture allows law enforcement to seize assets—cars, cash, homes—from people, often without having to prove they were guilty of a crime.
Hawaii, like many states, doesn't even require an arrest. /2
Here's an example. Hawaii is selling this Honda to the highest bidder. Missing from the site (and from the feel-good news story): The person cops took it from wasn't convicted of a crime.
Imagine having your car stolen & then seeing law enforcement sell it. Makes me see red. /3
I know people get abortions for different reasons, including health issues. I want to be empathetic. But it is also true that some people are aborting healthy fetuses that would survive outside of the womb. I can't wrap my head around that not being a form of murder.
I don't want to pick on a rando, but this is the kind of gaslighting that's become common when this topic comes up. Some just insist you're crazy. The article @emmma_camp_ links to from The Atlantic talks to someone performing these very abortions.
This is wild. Indiana law enforcement is seizing millions of dollars by rummaging through packages at the local FedEx hub & taking the money they find—without saying what crime the sender or recipient supposedly committed.
The scheme may violate Indiana's *own laws.* A thread.