#LesbianVisibilityWeek kicked off with the announcement by Just Like Us that 79% of lesbians in their study felt ashamed. With the caveat that we don’t know how the research was conducted or who was included as a young lesbian, this figure is really concerning.
As lesbians and researchers, a result like this raises lots of questions for us. Are young lesbians ashamed of being part of a bigger ‘community’, or of being lesbian full stop? Which factors help account for this? What do these young lesbians need to improve their wellbeing?
Sadly, #LesbianVisibilityWeek isn’t going to provide any answers to these questions. A quick look at the official website for the week, lesbianvisibilityweek.com, informs us that the week is ‘powered by DIVA and Stonewall’.
We don’t need to say much about Stonewall, or its CEO Nancy Kelley’s habit of positioning lesbians as ‘sexual racists’. The reputation of Stonewall among lesbians is well-established. Here’s Nancy celebrating a male ‘lesbian’ for LVW.
DIVA, the other org behind the LVW website, released its own research this week. DIVA is in no position to improve matters for young lesbians, as its research showed that only 24% of its young survey-takers said they were lesbians. We don't know the male/female split here.
The DIVA power list, also released for #LesbianVisibilityWeek, doesn’t look like it has much to offer young lesbians either.
The official #LesbianVisibilityWeek Twitter account, @LesbianVisWeek, has at times appeared too distractedly self-satisfied with the project’s haul of sponsorship money to remember that the week is about lesbians at all.
There are, of course, many heartening and uplifting posts being made by individual lesbians and unfunded lesbian groups for #LesbianVisibilityWeek, and we hope that any lesbians in need of solace or a sense of community are seeing these.
Our prevailing mood this week is anger, though. 79% of young lesbians in @JustLikeUsUK’s study said that they felt shame. This should be a major focus for LVW. But the main architects of #LesbianVisibilityWeek, evidenced by their own figures, predominantly reach non-lesbians.
We’re sick of hearing about this commercial jamboree, populated with lazy sponsors repeating the gender ideology slogans they’ve been asked to use, and older lesbians who, far from centring lesbians, offer up our words and our boundaries to the highest bidder.
The evidence points to an urgent need to research the apparent wellbeing crisis in young lesbians.
We think that for this to be done justice, there needs to be professional research situated far away from the #LesbianVisibilityWeek circus and the money and power which drive it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
DIVA magazine (which we can't tag as it blocks us) has released the results of its 2023 Survey. You can download a pdf of the report here: diva-magazine.com/2023/04/24/the…
In Linda Riley's introduction, she reminisces on the reason for DIVA's introduction in 1994. We remember the magazine from the late 1990s, and used to read it.
Fast forward to 2023, and in every age group who took part in the DIVA survey, the percentage of lesbians was below 50%. Across all age groups, 35% said they were lesbians, with 9% being asexual.
We’ve posted before about the Oban Lesbian Weekend, a summer event which is run as a private commercial enterprise. Despite the name, the event is open to anyone identifying as ‘LGBTQI+ women or non binary people’.
When we approached the organiser of OLW last year, we acknowledged that her commercial events can be for anyone she wishes, but asked her to consider that use of the word ‘lesbian’ is misleading for women genuinely looking for lesbian events.
We were told that the organiser found ‘lesbian’ to be a convenient shorthand to describe her events. We were accused of ‘dogwhistle transphobia’ and excluded from the online community for the event.
Hi @kezdugdale, we're Lorraine and Jenny and we run this account. You won't have heard of us- we're a small, grassroots group of lesbians who are worried about what is happening in Scotland. archive.vn/NiVFx
We don't get invited to give evidence to committees, and our views are routinely ignored or misrepresented by government funded LGBTQI organisations. The Government has only been interested in hearing from groups who agree with it, which is no way to make good law.
In this egregious attack on women and grassroots feminist groups, you call for facts and claim that there is no evidence of harm from self-ID. Of course there's no evidence, because no-one in those countries has cared enough about women to look.
A group of sociologists from Boston University is doing a study of ‘contemporary lesbian culture’. They’re using what they describe as a ‘broad’ definition of lesbian, to include ‘bi’ lesbians, ‘trans’ lesbians, and ‘lesbian men’. 1/
The inclusion of people who are not and cannot be lesbians in a study of lesbian culture devalues both the study and the experience of lesbians in an increasingly difficult and hostile environment. 2/
Going along with the lie that men can be women carries the implication that lesbians should be attracted to men, a fundamentally homophobic concept that contributes to the removal of lesbian rights and lesbian spaces. 3/