Wow. Dr. Chen's testimony is unbelievable. The medical officer of health said Nathaniel Spitzer, a 14 year old boy was the first child who passed away from Covid in Alberta, but he actually died of terminal brain cancer. Dr. Chen was his family doctor, the tumour had progressed
to the point it was visible, he lost his sight and the use of half of his body. He was admitted to the hospital for palliative care August 25th and passed on October 7th. Each week he got weaker and required more assistance and pain control. In the last few days prior to his
death he ended up having a fever and diarrhea, they tested for covid and he was positive. Dr. Chen knew the cause of death was due complications of the brain cancer. He explained the events leading up to his death to the medical examiners, to which they agreed not to write covid
on the death certificate. However, the chief medical officer, Dr. Hinshaw held a press conference announcing (without using Nathanials name) that they have had the first child death due to Covid in Alberta. His death was announced as the first covid death of a child, but Dr. Chen
did not mention Covid in the report. The death certificate did not mention covid, the discharge summary didnt mention covid, Dr. Chen was not interviewed including by Dr. Hinshaw and the family was not interviewed. The family of Nathaniel took to social media saying he did not
die from Covid, they put pressure on Dr. Hinshaw to which she appoligized for the hurt she caused for announcing his death this way which occurred a few days after the family's pressure.
#NCI 4:33:53 in @DrJBhattacharya was asked about censorship, the Canadian media and what happened when he came out as one of the 3 founding fathers of The Great Barrington Declaration in published in Oct 2020. "The CBC held a roundtable with 2 or 3 scientists who really didnt -
like the declaration. I don't even think they understood the declaration. The CBC essentially allowed them to say on the air, paid for by the Canadian taxpayers, that the Great Barrington Declaration was calling for letting the virus rip, essentially letting everyone get infected
when in fact, The Great Barrington Declaration as I said was the opposite of that. It was a strategy of focus protection of vulnerable older people. The idea wasn't to let the virus rip, the idea was to let young people live their normal lives." "In a sense, the CBC panelled a
#NCI is about to go live. Round table discussion with leading experts. Watch live with me at youtube.com/live/boftoM17k… or on spaces or wherever u can this is important. Expert insights from leading embalmers and funeral directors. Just have it on in the back ground!
COERCION IS NOT CONSENT @JustinTrudeau! THERE WAS NO INFORMED CONSENT! NONE! YOU USED FEAR TACTICS BASED ON FALSE DATA, YOU LIED TO CANADIANS AND FORCED PEOPLE TO VACCINATE OR LOSE THEIR LIVELIHOODS! YOU RUINED OUR LIVES AND KILLED PEOPLE WITH THIS NARRATIVE AND VACCINE!
YOU CONTINUE THE FEAR CAMPAIGN, COVID VACCINES CAUSE MORE HARM THAN GOOD, WE KNOW THE TRUTH! YOU FUCKED OVER EVERYONE! STOP LYING, STOP KILLING CANADIANS, STOP FEAR MONGERING! YOU ARE A HORRIBLE, VILE PERSON FOR EVERYTHING YOU'VE DONE AND CANADA WILL REJOICE WHEN WE'RE FINALLY
RID OF YOUR DICTATORSHIP! FUCK YOU AND EVERYTHING YOU STAND FOR TRAITOR! FUCK I HATE YOU!!
#NCI Winnipeg Day 1
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya-
"I thought that it was absolutely bog standard that you would evaluate evidence based on the quality of it, you'd prioritize high quality evidence vs. low quality evidence, you would try to understand the implications, the reasonable
applications would be drawn from the evidence and not make inferences outside what's reasonably inferable, if you had models you'd check the models against reality to see if the models actually doing well enough, you'd think about a whole wide range of outcomes from a policy not
just simply the punitive benefits of the policy but also the potential harms of the policy before you adopt it. All of these I thought were absolutely bog standard in public health and I think so many of those principles were thrown aside in the decision making around Covid
#NCI Winnipeg Day 1. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya comments on the governments narritive that children spread the virus faster than adults, restictions and lockdowns.
"I think alot of the school closures and restrictions on the lives of children was premised on this false notion that they
, like other respiratory viruses, are super spreaders for this one, but it doesn't correspond with the actual reality, as measured in the studies that came out in early 2020. And so, we shouldn't have acted as if that were the case. The restricting the lives of children was not a
necessary precondition to protecting older people. Active focus protection measures were possible to protect older people without restrictioning the lives of children. That's the key thing.
Children were essentially demonized, made to be seen as "grandma killers" and that was
4hr37m16s in @DrJBhattacharya - Professor of Medicine at Stanford, comments on censorship.
"I think it's important for the Canadian people to know that this was a systematic effort, not just by the media, but by government actors." youtube.com/live/5DAWUF46M…
He goes on to say, "There was a report in 2020 for instance that Canadian military used propaganda techniques on the Canadian citizens to combat disobedience against lockdowns." #NCI#nationalcitizensinquiry@Inquiry_Canada