(1) Gadar: Ek Prem Katha (2001) Tara Singh (Sunny Deol) was secretly an undercover Indian intelligence agent
His love story with Sakina (Amisha Patel) was a part of his mission to infiltrate Pakistan and gather valuable information about the country's political and military plans
during the tumultuous period following the Partition of India. The dramatic rescue of Sakina and her family was a cover for his intelligence operations, while also serving the purpose of reuniting the lovers.
(2). 3 Idiots (2009) it is believed that "Chatur" (Omi Vaidya) knew that "Phunsukh Wangdu" (played by Aamir Khan) was the scientist he wanted to sign a deal with.
Chatur used the two friends, Farhan and Raju, to find Wangdu and close the patent deal as Japanese were searching.
(3). Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge (1995) It is speculated that Raj (played by Shah Rukh Khan) and Simran's (played by Kajol) fathers were actually old friends who orchestrated their children's love story.
They secretly planned the European trip and arranged for Raj and Simran to meet, fall in love, and eventually reunite in India.
(4). Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (1998) Anjali (played by Kajol) knew all along that Rahul (played by Shah Rukh Khan) was in love with her, but she chose to keep her distance until he realized his feelings.
Anjali then orchestrated the summer camp reunion to give Rahul a chance to confess his love.
(5). Dhoom (2004) ACP Jai Dixit (played by Abhishek Bachchan) was secretly in league with the thieves led by Kabir (played by John Abraham). Jai helped them carry out their heists, intending to betray them in the end and take all the credit for their capture. #Dhoom
(6). Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara (2011) Imran (played by Farhan Akhtar), Arjun (played by Hrithik Roshan), and Kabir (played by Abhay Deol) had pre-planned their entire trip as a wayfind Imran's biological father. The other adventures were merely a cover for their true objective.
(7). Chennai Express (2013) This theory suggests that Rahul (played by Shah Rukh Khan) was actually an undercover police officer who infiltrated the crime family to bring them down. His love story with Meenamma (played by Deepika Padukone) was a ruse to gain the family
(8). Deewaar (1975) Vijay (played by Amitabh Bachchan) and Ravi (played by Shashi Kapoor) working together to bring down the crime lord Samant (played by Madan Puri). They staged their confrontations and disagreements infiltrate Samant's organization and dismantle it from within.
(9). Gol Maal (1979) It is speculated that Ramprasad (played by Amol Palekar) and Bhavani Shankar (played by Utpal Dutt) were actually in cahoots to test the loyalty and resourcefulness of the employees at the company. #Golmaal
Ramprasad's dual identity as Laxmanprasad was a ruse to identify dishonest employees and strengthen the company from within.
(10). Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham (2001) Rahul (played by Shah Rukh Khan) and Rohit (played by Hrithik Roshan) were secretly working together to reconcile their families. #K3G
They planned the entire sequence of events, including Rahul's return to India and the dramatic confrontation between the families.
Disclaimer: These are fan based conspiracy theories and all credit to the Original author. These are not meant for hurting feelings of anyone. These theories are never officially accepted by the Producer/Director/Actors.
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
๐๐ฎ๐๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐
The National Financial Reporting Authority (NAFRA) issued an order against CA Neeraj Bansal, a partner at SCV & Co. LLP, for professional misconduct in his role as the Statutory Auditor of Religare Finvest Limited (RFL) for the financial year 2017-18.
Section 132(4) empowers NAFRA to impose penalties and debar professionals in cases of professional misconduct.
CA Neeraj Bansal was found guilty of failing to meet the professional standards prescribed under the Standards on Auditing (SA) and Guidance Notes issued by ICAI.
Thoughts, Insight and Research by: Abhishek Raja Ram, 9810638155
Despite its unique structure, GST registrations and the law governing them remain subject to the overarching principles and provisions enshrined in the Constitution of India. This note examines the applicability of key constitutional articles to GST registrations.
1. Article Article 14: Equality before the law
Applicability: Article 14 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. In the context of GST, this implies that the registration process, criteria, and related provisions must be non-discriminatory and apply uniformly to all similarly situated individuals and entities.
Link with GST Laws:
GST laws and registration processes cannot arbitrarily discriminate between taxpayers. Any differences in treatment must be justified by a rational basis related to the objectives of the GST regime.
๐๐ฎ๐๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Mumbai, issued a penalty order against TPI India Limited under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, for violating Section 149(1) and Rule 3 of Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ต(๐ญ): Mandates that listed companies must appoint at least one woman director.
๐ฅ๐๐น๐ฒ ๐ฏ: Requires filling any intermittent vacancy of a woman director within three months or by the next board meeting, whichever is earlier.
The company failed to appoint a woman director after the previous woman director, Mrs. Darshana Bharat Parekh, resigned on November 12, 2021.
The default period is considered from February 13, 2022 (three months after resignation) to January 15, 2023 (date of appointment of a new woman director, Ms. Anjali Sapkal).
๐ข The court ruled, "Games such as rummy, which are predominantly skill-based, cannot be taxed under the 'gambling and betting' category, and are therefore not subject to the GST rate applied to gambling."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐:
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: Gameskraft Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI)
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ: W.P. 19570/2022
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 11-May-2023
"Demand of service tax cannot be confirmed merely based on figures in statutory records; the Department must prove the service was rendered."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐:
๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฒ๐: M/s GopiChenna and M/s SIS Teleservices Pvt Ltd
๐๐๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ: M/s GopiChenna faced a demand for service tax based on income shown in the Balance Sheet and ITRs, while M/s SIS Teleservices Pvt Ltd was accused of discrepancies between Form 26AS and ITR/ST-3 Returns. The demands were confirmed.