Gerardo L. Munck Profile picture
Apr 28 โ€ข 6 tweets โ€ข 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐——๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—น spent most of his career thinking about ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜†. He distinguished between the ideal (democracy) and the real (polyarchy). He also had a lot to say about the value of democracy. ๐Ÿงต Image
1/5 Ideal Democracy I. Dahl starts by arguing that the distinctive ideal of democracy is the strong principle of intrinsic equality, that all adults are the best judges of their interests.

Then he elaborated five โ€œcriteriaโ€ for a democratic process: ๐Ÿ‘‡ Source: Dahl, On Democracy ...
2/5 Ideal Democracy II. Dahl defines these five criteria as follows:๐Ÿ‘‡ Source: Dahl, On Democracy ...
3/5 Actual Democracy. Although Dahl holds that ideal democracy is unattainable, an approximation he calls polyarchy is attainable.

For Dahl, a polyarchy necessarily requires the presence of โ€œseven institutionsโ€: ๐Ÿ‘‡ Source: Dahl, Democracy and...
4/5 The Value of Democracy. Finally, Dahl articulates what he sees as 10 reasons why democracy and polyarchy are valuable and should be defended.๐Ÿ‘‡ Source: Dahl, On Democracy ...
5/5 Comment: Dahlโ€™s work is an indispensable point of reference in discussions about democracy. He links ideals to a realistically attainable arrangement of institutions. His discussion of the values of democracy could be seen as something idealistic & deserves critical scrutiny

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Gerardo L. Munck

Gerardo L. Munck Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GerardoMunck

Apr 28
๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐——๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—น pasรณ la mayor parte de su carrera pensando en la ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ. Distinguiรณ entre lo ideal (democracia) y lo real (poliarquรญa). Tambiรฉn tuvo mucho que decir sobre el valor de la democracia. ๐Ÿงต Image
1/5 Democracia ideal I. Dahl comienza argumentando que el ideal distintivo de la democracia es el fuerte principio de igualdad intrรญnseca, la idea que todos los adultos son los mejores jueces de sus intereses.

Luego elabora โ€‹โ€‹cinco โ€œcriteriosโ€ para un proceso democrรกtico. ๐Ÿ‘‡ Fuente: Dahl, La democracia...
2/5 Democracia ideal II. Dahl define estos โ€‹โ€‹cinco โ€œcriteriosโ€ de la siguiente manera:๐Ÿ‘‡ Fuente: Dahl, La democracia...
Read 6 tweets
Apr 26
๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ปโ€™s main contribution to the discussion of ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜† was his articulation and justification of a concept of democracy. I focus on that aspect of his work. ๐Ÿงต Image
๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—œ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€. Kelsen provides some ideas that help to focus the discussion by (1) pinpointing the core value that guides democracy (political freedom), and (2) saying what democracy is not (a matter of outcomes or of the state).๐Ÿ‘‡ Sources: Hans Kelsen, The E...
๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜†. Building on his general ideas, Kelsen specifies the properties of democracy in some detail. Many are by now conventional, some (the last two) are not.๐Ÿ‘‡ Sources: Hans Kelsen, The E...
Read 4 tweets
Apr 26
La principal contribuciรณn de ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป a la discusiรณn de la ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ fue su articulaciรณn y justificaciรณn de un concepto de democracia. Me concentro en ese aspecto de su trabajo. ๐Ÿงต Image
๐—œ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€. Kelsen proporciona algunas ideas que ayudan a centrar la discusiรณn al (1) seรฑalar el valor central que guรญa a la democracia (libertad polรญtica) y (2) decir lo que no es la democracia (una cuestiรณn de resultados o del Estado).๐Ÿ‘‡ Fuentes: Hans Kelsen, Esenc...
๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ. Sobre la base de sus ideas generales, Kelsen especifica las propiedades de la democracia con cierto detalle. Muchas ya son convencionales, algunas (las dos รบltimas) no lo son.๐Ÿ‘‡ Fuentes: Hans Kelsen, Esenc...
Read 4 tweets
Apr 19
Kuhnโ€™s idea of a paradigm is flawed: paradigms are not incommensurable, mature sciences do not have only 1 paradigm,& paradigms do not have their own standards of assessment. In contrast, the narrower idea of metatheory, abstract&general ideas used in theory-building, is useful๐Ÿงต Image
1/18 Problem I. Much of what is presented as theory is no more than stand-alone hypotheses or lists of variables, ie, ideas that are not actually theories.

On this, see Sutton & Staw, โ€œWhat Theory Is Not,โ€ Administrative Science Quarterly (1995). โžก๏ธ funginstitute.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uplโ€ฆ
2/18 Problem I. This way of thinking about โ€œtheoryโ€ leads to a big problem: the chaotic proliferation of stand-alone hypotheses. And, as a quick look at journals shows, the increased focus on hypothesis testing does not provide a solution to this problem.
Read 19 tweets
Mar 27
Talk of ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐—บ๐˜€ is common in the social sciences. But what are social mechanisms? We have 2 basic views: 1) mechanisms are intervening variables & 2) mechanisms necessarily involve actors & actions. Only the latter have a distinct epistemological value๐Ÿงต
1/15 The Intuition. Independent (explanatory) variables identify ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต factors have an effect on a dependent variable.

Mechanisms account for ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ such factors produce an effect.

So, we should open the black box between IV and DV & posit the mechanism that connects them.
2/15 Mechanisms in the Natural Sciences. Here's an example from physics

Boyle's (black box) law: Pressure is inversely proportional to volume of the gas at constant temperature

Mechanism: The kinetic theory of gases explains how pressure is created by the collision of particles
Read 16 tweets
Mar 13
๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† & ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†. The world is made up of things that have properties (qualities) to different degrees (quantities). Yet many scholars mistakenly assume that all differences (& changes) can be represented along a continuum. This assumption should be questioned.๐Ÿงต Source: Barrington Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and
๐Ÿญ/๐Ÿฒ ๐—˜๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€.A trend in the social sciences is to focus on quantitative differences.& this is very valuable. All properties (beyond existence) are possessed by things to different degrees. We need to theorize&test hypotheses about such differences
๐Ÿฎ/๐Ÿฒ ๐—œ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€. But a common position in the sciences goes further and denies or plays down qualitative differences. This position is called gradualism (Leibniz, Darwin, Nisbet), synechism (Charles Peirce), degreeism (G. Sartori), as well as continuism.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(