About @marwilliamson changing the subject. Watch how she turns on @franifio in this clip (cue at 10:55).
Francesca has a basic question about strategizing against fascists. MW opens with one bit of comms advice, but then pivots to sanctimony. /1
She needs to *quickly* land in her wheelhouse, to model non-defensiveness and non-aggression, and to scold the naively reactive and emotional younger woman across from her. The next minutes are pure tone policing. She’s avoided the question and has zeroed in on F’s attitude. /2
It’s tricky, because MW always throws in reality-based items like “on the political level you have to seize the levers of power.” But that’s not what she can elaborate on. That’s secondary to her expertise and instinct. /3
What she can elaborate on is how if younger people like Francesca were less angry, if she only worked on herself more, if she accepted that only love was real, the world would miraculously change. It's a kind of shaming that is hard to see, because it's delivered with a smile. /4
If this feels good to you, it was designed to. Changing the subject from mundane complexities to spiritual simplicities is MW's primary skill, honed over decades, and not unique to her. It is a redirection schtick you'll hear 1000 New Thought / New Age influencers do. /5
It might have psychological value sometimes. But I think everyone should be clear that if MW is good at making people feel disarmed by a suddenly-cosmic view, it's because her 40 years of training has taught her to change the subject to God when things get heavy. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Please track how many times @marwilliamson answers a complex question about strategy by changing the subject, instantly, to love, consciousness, forgiveness, and transcending right and left polarities. That’s her theory of change. I understand if you enjoy how it feels... /1
…it is novel and disarming and creates a moment of uncanny relief in the tornado of political discourse. But dodging every IRL question is not a “new politics”. It’s actually not politics at all, but the echo of 40 years of doling out spiritual advice to mainly white women. /2
The spiritual advice from Williamson’s A Course in Miracles is simplistic, cookie-cutter, presented as a panacea. It is a magic pill from a higher plane that says everything will be healed if you change your mind and love your enemy. It is not equipped to understand fascism. /3
For no particular reason I'm thinking of Nguyen + Williams' "Moral Outrage Porn"
"Moral outrage porn, as we understand it, is representations of moral outrage engaged with primarily for the sake of the resulting gratification, freed from the usual costs and consequences... /1
of engaging with morally outrageous content. The gratifications might include, among other things, a sense of moral superiority or smugness, the comforting sense of clarity that arises from moral certainty, and the sheer pleasure of the feeling of outrage itself. /2
We suspect that a significant amount of the activity on Facebook, Twitter, and other forms of social media might plausibly count as moral outrage porn, as does much of the content on many partisan news outlets. /3
The *second* major conspirituality influencer that we've covered has now declared a primary challenge to Biden.
RFK Jr's conspirituality runs parallel to that of Marianne Williamson (the subject of our main feed episode today). /1
MW leans with full devotion into New Age Jesus as the source of her political teleology, her battle against dark psychic forces, and her belief that meditation can help ward off COVID. /2
RFK Jr. is more opportunistic, willing to marshal apocalyptic evangelicalism and ally with the Nation of Islam to electrify his paranoid pseudoscience. /3
The unbearable need to endow with meaning and to forge biospiritual connections between tissues and issues.
I wonder if Sell realizes her correlations are culturally dependent. I'm not sure if she's taking these from German New Medicine, but in the Ayurvedic imaginary: /1
Bones = orderliness, paternal relationships, orientation to the Sun
Skin = regulation of fire and water elements, expression of Mercury
GI tract = desire, passion, leadership
Muscles = courage and work maintained by Saturn or the principle of binding /2
So how is the consumer of postmodern reconstructions of premodern health systems to choose which one is right for them? Answer: they have to get really good at the vibes check. /3
Anyone saying that #MarianneWilliamson's politics can be separated from her religious commitments is being naive.
Understanding where she's coming from spiritually is essential to assessing the calculus of what she says vs. what she believes vs. what she would do. /1
Bits like this made MW stand out in the summer of 2019 because they were disruptive to the typical discourse, and they grounded her brand in outsidership.
But they also revealed Williamson’s real career as a spiritual influencer. They pointed at her sources. /2
If you listen closely, you can hear echoes of #ACourseinMiracles, the New Age Bible that MW has been meditating on every day since 1977, and lecturing from since 1983.
As #MarianneWilliamson implies in her damage control statement on the Politico report, politics has plenty of bullies. But people should know that being a “tough boss lady,” as she euphemizes, may also be inspired by what an asshole her Jesus is—in A Course in Miracles. /1
Pious, condescending, and emotionally avoidant, the Jesus channeled by ACIM intones three continuous insults: 1) You are deluded about reality, 2) The absolute truth of My teachings is inescapable, and 3) Any resistance you have to Me is further delusion. Sound familiar? /2
The weird part? ACIM is a channeled text that demands the reader become its channel. The daily lessons are “written” by Jesus, but meant to be recited and meditated upon by the normal person, *as if they were Jesus.* Surprise: ACIM teachers struggle to not sound like assholes./3