3 gab.
(The first red marked sentence read:“Testing of blood samples from 4 patients indicate: All 4 patient blood samples contained SARS-CoV IgG antibodies. Of which, 2 have high level of antibodies, 2 have low level of antibodies. (Wuhan institute of Virology)”)
4 gab
gab.com/Flavinkins/pos…
Their initial story: they had a short section of RdRp, it showed high identity to SARS-CoV-2, and that led them to fully sequence it. @Daoyu15@daoyu
5 gab
They should have said they had the full genome since 2018 and disclosed the miners backstory. (……then mutilated the RBD and the rest of the genome so much for distance (by changing the base calls at the relevant aligned positions in the SRA data,
6 gab
and resynthesizing the fragments for several Sanger amplicons), that it is no longer a viable virus at time of publication. zenodo.org/record/5702700 zenodo.org/record/5778318 Both the Nsp15 and the S2 were subjected to
7 gab
synomynous alterations in order to add distance. However, since the packaging signal of Sarbecoviruses are located within the nsp15 CDS, this act destroyed the packaging signal sequence and consequently rendered the entire RaTG13 backbone unviable. Nobody have successfully
8 gab
created and rescued anninfectious clone of RaTG13.) peerj.com/articles/11686/
The background SRA file came from an already isolated strain that was grown in RaK4324-BamHI/ACE2 cells. gab.com/Flavinkins/pos…
zenodo.org/record/4476508…
Here is the Zhongnan Shan quote:
1: 间质性肺炎,病毒可能性大 which mean “interstitial pneumonia, high likelihood of viral origin”.
2: 侵袭性肺曲霉病(继发)which mean “invasive lung aspergillosis (secondary)”.
The recommendation read: “1.到昆明动物研究所确定蝙蝠类型;2.做咽试纸试验和SARS抗体试验;3.用卡泊芬净、头孢哌酮舒巴坦和美罗培南治疗;4.加强气道管理,用纤支镜吸痰(不行注水及灌洗)”.
The first and second mean “1: go to Kunming Institute of Zoology to @Daoyu15@daoyu
12 gab
identify the specific bat species. 2: perform a throat test strip test and a SARS antibody test.”. The 3 drugs are 卡泊芬净,头孢哌酮舒巴坦 and 美罗培南. The first is an antifungal while the other 2 are antibacterials. The last is to “focus on airway management”. @Daoyu15
13 gab
(Remember how China was exporting ventilator hysteria and recommending “invasive mechanical ventilation” for COVID-19 patients? dossier.substack.com/p/first-choice…
And the “black fungus” that were affecting COVID-19 patients in early 2021 India? @Daoyu15
14 gab
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…)
Despite the treatment, the miner eventually died “出院情况:死亡”.
The “invasive pulmonary asperigillosis” was only secondary in the Zhongnan Shan quoted
15
Yet another action indicating incriminating information hidden inside the Mojiang mine—if there is “nothing interesting other than RaTG13”, China should open the mine to foreign samplers and investigators for verification. In stead, roadblocks were put @Daoyu15@daoyu
Up, swiftly and Specifically by authorities upon learning from the slightest whim that foreign reporters and investigators are approaching the mine—something that they did not do with any other caves or mines in Yunnan.
Failing to permit independent investigation into the matters again indicate an intent to protect information from unauthorized extraction—“sensitive site, no entry, no photography or recording”. “此地无银三百两”. theweek.in/theweek/cover/… Why block it off with roadblocks
18
Erected swiftly and only against foreign reporters and investigators, most importantly never permitted independent investigation into this location if there is “nothing to hide?”. web.archive.org/web/2021020606…
zenodo.org/record/4476508…
Here is the Zhongnan Shan quote:
1: 间质性肺炎,病毒可能性大 which mean “interstitial pneumonia, high likelihood of viral origin”.
2: 侵袭性肺曲霉病(继发)which mean “invasive lung aspergillosis (secondary)”. @Daoyu15@daoyu
22 gab
The recommendation read: “1.到昆明动物研究所确定蝙蝠类型;2.做咽试纸试验和SARS抗体试验;3.用卡泊芬净、头孢哌酮舒巴坦和美罗培南治疗;4.加强气道管理,用纤支镜吸痰(不行注水及灌洗)”.
The first and second mean “1: go to Kunming Institute of Zoology to identify the specific
23 gab
bat species. 2: perform a throat test strip test and a SARS antibody test.”. The 3 drugs are 卡泊芬净,头孢哌酮舒巴坦 and 美罗培南. The first is an antifungal while the other 2 are antibacterials. The last is to “focus on airway management”. @Daoyu15@daoyu
(Remember how China was exporting ventilator hysteria and recommending “invasive mechanical ventilation” for COVID-19 patients? dossier.substack.com/p/first-choice…
25 gab @Daoyu15
And the “black fungus” that were affecting COVID-19 patients in early 2021 India? ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…)
Despite the treatment, the miner eventually died “出院情况:死亡”.
The “invasive pulmonary asperigillosis” was only secondary in the Zhongnan Shan quote.
26
Now even alice hughes is considering it likely viral. @Daoyu15@daoyu
More contradiction: BANAL-52 RBD is identical to BANAL-103 RBD. BANAL-52 Spike is as expected unable to use R.pusillus ACE2. BANAL-236 can, but not Pusillus. How can BANAL-103 exist?
31
A major admission here: @AliceCHughes who long worked in Yunnan on bat coronaviruses believes the Mojiang miners had a novel coronavirus infection in 2012 and not a fungal infection,
.@AliceCHughes: "... we were the fifth research group that year, since April 2020, that were going looking for bat viruses in Yunnan. Because, of course, it was an important area. We know from the Mojiang miners that it was an important area."
all manner of papers blaming all manner of animal species all the way up to April 2020? An obvious answer to this question is that the original market data look nothing like its uploaded version. No data is allowed outside China or onto foreign repositories without approval.
Felis Catus (house cats) are the only species that tested positive in Wuhan early in the pandemic. Cluster 1 visited Thailand in November 2019. The anomalously uninfected group in Wuhan are cat handlers in the pet circle (animal shelters and pet shops, not markets). Cats are
2
More Wuhan cats. Somehow nobody contacting a cat in Wuhan were infected. ???
archive.ph/dx9dc web.archive.org/web/2021070116…
Despite Shi’s lies that it was “taken down in February 2020 due to hacking attempts”, and whining of hardline zoonati activists, Msis record of the WIV Batvirus database does not indicate evidence of @Daoyu15@daoyu
Result).
You find exactly 32 “unlinked cases” dots in the 25% KDE estimate of Worobey et al. And oh. The 10/12/2019 case isn’t on the WHO map. How you can confirm that she is in the market or lived near?
And the animal mix they used was in deed DNA from archived specimens. the number of mappings to coding sequences was below the density of CDS in average mammalian genomes.
Their claimed mapping to transcripts are consistent with the number of CDS in the genome (31/4622), and some of the CDS are cut in the middle. This imply an DNA origin.