When films were first broadcast on TV, studios tried to use this as a loophole to keep from paying writers.
When pay TV and VCRs appeared? Studios tried again.
Every time there's been a new way to distribute media, it's taken a #WritersStrike to get fair pay.
In fact the whole reason that union rules appear esoteric and byzantine from the outside is because at some point or another the studios tried to cut their labor force out of the profits and the unions had to pin them down with exhaustively precise contracts.
So when streaming appeared, the studios said "hey this isn't in the contract that means we can keep all the money" which is why we have yet another fucking strike.
They've been doing this shit since the 1950s and they never ever stop trying to screw their labor.
I promise you, writers aren't luddites. They *love* new tech. They love anything that helps make it easier to do their work or expand their reach.
What they hate is that every time the studios try to use the fact that new tech isn't in existing contracts to screw their labor.
(Actually the true historical basis of the luddites was exactly the same damn thing wow I guess they are luddites)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At some point the challenge of a second or third or twentieth adaptation is how to distinguish it. A new interpretation? A stoically faithful one? Sleeker or more complex?
With these films the idea seems to be "as faithful as possible but make the visuals the centerpiece."
I can't fault that approach. Lynch went with the "new interpretation" idea that focused the whole thing through his own surreal lens.
Villeneuve's take so far has been "We're doing the whole fucking thing and it's gonna look goddamn tight," and that seems smart.
AI is not artificial intelligence. It's an aggregator that uses statistical analysis and pattern recognition to identify elements of a photo, of writing, or whatever task it's being used for.
Think of how many people here on social media can't grasp that.
Neither can CEOs.
Everything produced by what they call "AI" is just a collage. Oh, it's a very complex and complicated collage, but a collage none the less.
There's nothing original. What's produced is just a series of rehashes and further the system doesn't UNDERSTAND what it spits out.
And that's the crucial element: without comprehension, the product of AI is gibberish.
It's complex gibberish that doesn't present that way at first, but as you go longer into the work you realize it doesn't actually make any sense.
Ooooooohh speaking of Marvel, I just realized: if Disney wants to air season two of Loki this year, they have no choice but to keep Majors in the scenes already filmed.
Even if worse information comes out.
Replacing him in post without re-writes would entail huge contortions.
They swapped Chris D'elia out of Army of the Dead and replaced him with Tig Notaro during the pandemic.
It cost a lot but it was doable.
Trouble is, it required minor re-writes and adding a few new bits to even out the swap.
The big problem that will arise beyond House of the Dragon's *existing* problems is that they won't be able to do any re-writes.
No re-shoots, no changes to ADR, nothing.
And when that happens, the end results tends to be messier than usual.
I don't think people realize how much an episode can change in post.
Have you ever watched a show and heard a line of ADR that explains or alters a plot point you're watching? Sometimes they fuck up and try to correct it or they're accounting for a cut scene.
So Star Trek Online has a new story arc coming, and while this is pure supposition I think I know what's about to happen: they're finally going to officially disengage STO from being the "prime" timeline.
It makes sense, honestly. The original developers behind STO never expected Trek to return like this.
At the time it was released, it looked as though the only new Trek going forward was going to be the Kelvin Timeline films and that the old timeline would be free to use.
But now there's been Discovery, Lower Decks, Picard and even Strange New Worlds and Prodigy ...all of these are new canon entries and ALL of them have specifically contradicted Star Trek Online in major ways.
Hell, Prodigy undermines a huge chunk of the Delta Quadrant expansion.