HernanDoItYouCanDoIt Profile picture
May 5 7 tweets 1 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Prac Exercises

TYPICAL CONTRACT FORM PARTS:

Title
Announcement
Actors

Recitals
Agreement
Conditions

Signatories
Acknowledgement

Code: TAA-RAC-SA

#HernanDoIt
AFIDAVITS

Venue of Execution
Title
Person's Bona Fides
Oath
Statements
Signature
Jurat

Code: VeTiPeOStaSiJu
Parts of a Typical Judicial Form

Caption
Title
Introduction
Body
Relief
Attorney’s Box
Addenda

Code: Cap-TIBRA-A
Sec 20 Rule 138 - Duties of attorneys
CPRA has the force and effect of law and should be obeyed.
THE LAWYER AND SOCIETY
Canons 1-6, Code of Professional Responsibility

•Respect for law and legal processes
•Efficient and convenient legal services
•True, honest, fair, objective and dignified information on legal services
•Participation in the improvement and reforms of the legal system, and legal education programs

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with HernanDoItYouCanDoIt

HernanDoItYouCanDoIt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AttywithDOT2023

May 3
Q: May the court deny the prosecution's motion for arraignment beyond sixty (60) days from the time of the filing by the Accused of his Petition for Review with the DOJ?
Answer:
No. In the absence of any TRO or Writ of Preliminary Injunction from a higher tribunal, the court can
only suspend the proceedings against the Accused for sixty (60) days from the filing of the Accused's Petition for Review with the DOJ.
The court's failure to proceed with the arraignment of the Accused without any TRO or Injunction is erroneous as "it disregards the requirements
of due process and erodes the court's independence and integrity." (ABS-CBN Corporation vs.
Felipe Gozon, et al., G.R. No. 195956, March 11, 2015).

#HernanDoIt
Read 56 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(