I know people think that sharing those images is the righteous thing to do. But a few points. (Sorry, another 🧵): 1) The loved ones of these individuals did not consent to this. Mamie Till (who people keep invoking) was fully aware of what she was doing and made a choice.
2) Many of the people you are sharing this with (politicians who have chosen the gun lobby) also saw the carnage from other mass shootings, including Uvalde.
If that didn’t sway them, will this? Probably not, and in the meantime you’ve traumatized a whole lot of people because
this platform is currently really bad at obscuring or warning about sensitive content.
Everyone (except for the people who allow this to happen) is angry. The key is remembering that anger when it comes time to vote.
Tomorrow is the last day the #RaisetheAge bill can get out
of committee. Spend today and tomorrow contacting the members of the House Select committee on Community Safety and urge them to report favorably.
Email them. Call them. Repeat that. Then start calling your representatives to urge them to pass it.
And finally: 3) Photos of dead bodies does not show us what we’ve lost. The stories of these people that will come in the next few days? That’s what we’ve lost. We’ve lost potential, we’ve lost community, and that is what should be recognized.
Those people were loved. They, in their own ways that we’ll learn about over time, were extraordinary people doing an ordinary thing. Knowing them will serve a better purpose than sharing their corpses without their consent.
The gunman took their lives. Don’t take their dignity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So you folk arguing that passing gun laws won’t work because some people won’t follow them. I have some things to say to you, and I don’t need you to respond because my patience is gone on this subject. Gone. 1) We don’t pass laws based on whether everyone will follow them. 🧵
If we did pass laws based on that litmus, I think this bodes well for any and all marijuana legislation. In fact, why did we pass all those abortion bills? Some people won’t follow them, after all.
No. We pass laws and if people break those laws they go to prison. 2) Let me repeat: We pass laws and if you break them you go to jail. 3) Let me repeat again: We don’t pass laws based on whether some people
won’t follow them.
As a Christian who prays on the regular, I find that after this many preventable gun deaths, extending your thoughts and prayers and doing precious little else cheapens the conversation with God.
James 2:14, 17: "What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him?
So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
Allen didn't have to happen. Uvalde didn't have to happen. The state representative that led the charge for a permitless carry bill? Those are his dead constituents under those white sheets.
God isn't listening, guys, because you're not doing.
Yesterday someone asked me if I thought Twitter would get sued by Lilly or any other company that was spoofed by a blue check account.
I should explain I am not a lawyer, but I’ve written about the law for too many years.
Section 230 protects parody, so the answer could be no. But, as usual, these are not normal times. 230 protects platforms from being sued because of the things published on them, but in this case, Twitter took the extra step of conveying legitimacy to the account
with that blue check mark. 230 was meant to kind of say, “Listen, we know you have a lot of users and it’s not feasible to police them all 24/7.” But in this case, it could be argued that since you have to apply for and pay for a blue check, this provided opportunity
The oldest of nine children, Jacqueline Macal was raised in Dallas, and during World War II, she found herself in New River, North Carolina, attending basic training after she joined the Marines.
Basic training, she said in an interview almost 10 years ago, was tough, thanks to a “sorry and no good” red-headed sergeant from Georgia who put the women who signed up to serve through their paces.
“I can’t remember his name and I think maybe the good Lord did that,” she told an interviewer with the Texas Veterans Land Board’s Voices of Veterans Oral History Program.
So since it is Friday, here’s a thread of things I’ve written this week:
“I walk around work hollering that I’m feeding the babies, but I really didn’t know what else to do. It was such a rash, ridiculous thing that I did out of anger, but it’s restored my faith in humanity.” dmagazine.com/style-beauty-w…
Dallas ISD trustees paved the way for Stephanie Elizalde to lead the district after Michael Hinojosa’s departure. She last worked in the district as chief of school leadership. dmagazine.com/frontburner/20…
This morning, in a FB group I’m in, a woman told us she is having a miscarriage. Her doctor prescribed misoprostol to help her complete the miscarriage. The doctor had to spend 30 minutes explaining to a Walgreens pharmacist that she wasn’t having an abortion. 🧵
The first round of misoprostol didn’t work. The doctor calls in another round, and she heads to the pharmacy to pick it up. After waiting 20 minutes, she is told by the pharmacist that they’ve talked to colleagues and the corporate office, and have decided not to fill it,
… because they don’t know for sure she isn’t using it for an abortion.
This is what happens when you don’t actually consider women’s health when making policy.