Starting with the same shell of a prompt I used in the last couple of threads (see previous tweets).
Let's break down the prompt and see the results.
Thread.
This is the initial prompt I started with:
High fashion portrait shoot of a supermodel, in the style of curved mirrors, symmetrical lines, neoclassical style, ultra-realistic, hyper-detailed --ar 16:9
These are simply my observations. It doesn't mean this is the right way.
Stripping down the prompt:
I took out curved mirrors, neoclassical style.
I added "in Iceland" (random). Add anything you'd like.
New prompt in ALT.
Taking out another layer.
Removed ultra-realistic and hyper-detailed.
The prompt now:
High fashion portrait shoot of a supermodel in Iceland, symmetrical --ar 16:9
The girl in white looks cold. 😆
Next:
Removed "High" - from fashion.
The prompt now:
A fashion portrait shoot of a supermodel in Iceland, symmetrical --ar 16:9
Then,
Removed "Fashion" too.
Prompt now:
A portrait shoot of a supermodel in Iceland, symmetrical --ar 16:9
While I peel these layers I pay attention to what differences I see (if any).
I really like the first image.
At this point, I wanted to see if changing the "shoot" to a "photo" would make a difference.
Note! If you do not add either - the results vary (often not photos).
Here are the results and the prompt.
a portrait photo of a supermodel in Iceland, symmetrical --ar 16:9
Note about "symmetry"
Symmetry seems to center the subject and, well, make the scene symmetrical.
If you remove symmetry, you get more "organic" images.
Using symmetry sometimes make a line in the middle.
Prompt:
a portrait photo of a supermodel in Iceland --ar 16:9
At this point, the prompt is just about as stripped as possible.
Now I can play with some other elements.
A few more variations.
If you take out "portrait" and insert something else - you get something completely different - more on that soon.
Also, the aspect ratio changes things. To keep things consistent, I used --ar 16:9 aspect ratio throughout.
It's not to say that this is the right way or the only way. This is simply a method I often use to help me observe what certain elements might be doing in a prompt and whether they are taken into consideration by Midjourney, and how, if at all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
- Can't be combined together (possible in the future)
- Can't be used together with style you apply from an image - see screenshots
First screenshot
Add a style using the generated image (click 'style' at the bottom right).
Use the same prompt (click 'prompt' at the bottom right).
Generate the image grid.
Second screenshot
The generated image grid.
The sref 472 (in this case) as been removed and only the image style ref remains - if you look at the parameters on the right.
RenderNet has added a Character Lab to their suite of features making it super easy to create a character and then consistently place that character in any setting.
This is how.
1. Go to
2. Choose or create a character
- I chose Alice rendernet.ai/app
3. Use an existing Canvas or create a new one
- I created a new one
Note. Using 'seamless pattern' in the prompt does not generated a 'true' seamless pattern. It may look like the pattern is seamless, but when lining up several images you'll notice that they do not create a seamless pattern.
Example:
Here I used 'seamless pattern' but not the tile parameter.
Prompt:
retro, yellow and orange, 70's pattern
How to use tile parameter
Add --tile at the end of your prompt
You can use --tile both on Discord and on Alpha Website.
Prompt:
retro abstract, circles and oval spears, lime green and aqua --tile --stylize 250