The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
May 8, 2023 22 tweets 8 min read Read on X
People in the Middle Ages knew the earth was round, as you can see from this 900 year old drawing.

So where did the myth come from that Medieval people thought the earth was flat?

Well, it was once an important part of America's national identity... A spherical Earth showing t...
People have known the earth is round for well over two thousand years.

In about 360 BC the philosopher Plato wrote this:

"Wherefore he made the world in the form of a globe, round as from a lathe, having its extremes in every direction equidistant from the centre." Image
But it wasn't only philosophers; Ancient Greek astronomers had *proven* the earth was round.

In about 240 BC a chap called Eratosthenes calculated its circumference to within 1% of the real figure.

He measured the lengths of shadows in two different places to do so. Image
Perhaps the most influential ancient astronomer was Ptolemy, who lived and worked in Alexandria, Egypt, during the 2nd century AD.

He proposed a model of the universe with the spherical earth at the centre, surrounded by "celestial spheres" holding the planets and stars. Image
None of this was lost with the fall of the Roman Empire — it carried straight through to the so-called Dark Ages.

Hence the Venerable Bede, writing in 725 AD, said that the earth "is, in fact, a sphere...not merely circular like a shield... but resembles a ball." Image
The list of scholars and theologians who believed the earth to be round is endless, because that was the accepted view.

In 1230 a monk and astronomer called John of Holywood wrote a treatise called... On the Spherical World.

Here's an illustration from a later edition. Image
Just take the crowning achievement of Medieval literature — Dante's Divine Comedy, written in the early 1300s.

It narrates a journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven, all according to Medieval cosmology.

And this was how artists depicted Dante's journey: The Chamber of Hell by Anto...
This explains why most monarchs in Medieval Europe had globes affixed with crosses as part of their royal regalia — and why the coronation of Charles III included one.

Known as the "globus cruciger", it symbolised both their and Jesus' dominion over the (spherical) Earth. ImageImage
So where did the idea come from that Medieval people thought the earth was flat?

In some sense it can be traced back to Petrarch, the founding figure of the Renaissance, who came up with the idea of the "Dark Ages" in the 14th century. Image
This view — that the centuries between the Fall of Rome and the Renaissance were an age of darkness — was (and remains) pervasive.

In the 17th century it became anti-Catholic propaganda to say the Middle Ages had been held back by the Catholic Church.
In the 19th century, however, this myth became something more.

In an 1874 book called "The Conflict between Science and Religion", the American writer and scientist John William Draper said this: Image
Where did Draper (and others) get this idea from?

They largely seized on the work of a 6th century merchant-turned-scholar called Cosmas Indicopleustes.

He had argued that Ptolemy was wrong and that the earth was, in fact, flat. ImageImage
But Cosmas Indicopleustes was an exception, and an uninfluential one at that; the Ptolemaic model remained dominant throughout the Middle Ages.

To add to the previous examples, in 1245 a priest called Gautier de Metz wrote "the earth is in the shape of a ball." Image
Not that it mattered.

In 1828 Washington Irving wrote a fictional (and incredibly popular) biography of Christopher Columbus, in which he said:

"To his simplest proposition, the spherical form of the earth, were opposed figurative texts of scripture." Image
Irving painted Columbus as an enlightened hero facing down Catholic ignorance, as an honest mariner "pleading the case of the New World."

Many came to believe that it was Columbus who proved the earth was round and restored the foolish world to the truths of ancient knowledge. Image
But the truth was the opposite; his expedition was made *because* everybody agreed the earth was round, and that sailing west might be an alternative route to trade in the east.

In 1481 the priest and astronomer Paolo Toscanelli wrote this letter to Columbus: Image
The real source of opposition to Columbus' plan was, as Irving correctly mentions, that he miscalculated the distance (which he had) — and that it was impossible.

Well, in 1492 Columbus proved them wrong on the latter point; and unexpectedly came across the Americas. Image
That Medieval people thought the earth was flat is a myth that has endured into the 21st century, propagated once by school textbooks and now by popular media.

But why did people like Draper and Irving revive and entrench it? There seem to be two main reasons.
The first is that it was a perfect way not only to paint the Middle Ages as ignorant but to condemn their religious society entirely.

It supported the idea of a conflict between religion and science, as expounded by Andrew White, a founder of Cornell University, in 1876: Image
The second is that, in the hands of 19th century writers and scholars, it created and renewed a foundational myth for America.

One in which the nation was discovered and founded on enlightened, scientific, rational values — rather than the "monastic bigotry" of Medieval Europe. Image
After American independence the Founding Fathers filled it with neoclassical architecture; they would be the inheritors and successors of Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome.

And Columbus' alleged defence of classical knowledge played directly into that narrative. Image
Alas, Medieval people may have had some fanciful ideas, many of which have been disproven — such as the earth being at the centre of the universe.

But they did not believe the earth was flat any more than we do in the 21st century... Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(