There is this narrative going around that Checo wasn't informed enough of what Verstappen was doing, so let's dive into it and see what's what. Lap 21 Checo Pits for Hard Tyres. HB tells him on exit MV's last time on hard tyres "32.2." Lap 22 a few minor setting changes 🧵
Lap 22 SP 1.31.5, MV1.32.27. Checo asks HB on lap 23, what is MV's last lap?" HB tells him "Max was a 32.2." Lap 24 HB comes on the radio and tells SP "Max a 31.9." Checo did a 31.86 on lap 23. 🧵
Lap 24 HB asks about balance on the hard. Lap 25 HB tells Checo "Max that time a 32.1, gap 17 seconds." SP does a 31.4 on lap 24. Lap 26 HB tells SP "31.9 for Max, gap 16.6." SP did a 31.4 on lap 25. 🧵
Lap 27, HB tells SP "Max's lap 31.9, 26 laps complete, 31 remaining." SP did a 31.58 on lap 26. On lap 27, HB comes on and tells SP where he is losing time and how he can improve turns 14 and 15. It goes on lap to lap that HB updates SP on each lap time from MV.
Lap 29, HB tells Checo where he is losing time in Sector 2 to Max. He then asks Checo "What is your limitation in Sector 2?" SP responds "Traction." Lap 29, HB comes on the radio while SP is in S3, and says "That was better in Sector 2." 🧵
Lap 41 HB tells SP "Max doing a larger lift and coast, there is margin to go forward on the bias (brake bias)." Start Lap 47 HB tells SP, "Max pitted. Expect him to be about 1 second behind." Lap 48, HB gives checo MV time behind "1 sec, adjust diff mid help in S2." 🧵
Even after MV passes SP, HB continues to give SP suggestions for how to improve his times. So IMO there is NOTHING to this narrative that RB didn't help SP like they did MV. Not sure where it came from, but as you can see from the radio messages, this is not true. #MiamiGP 🧵
So far it seems that MV and SP are racing very fair, and their off track relationship is healthy. Both Hugh Bird and Gianpiero Lambiase are as good as they get. At every race I've observed. Very good Race Engineering from both. 🧵
Sucks that people won't do the work to investigate themselves what happened, but throw shade at @redbullracing and Hugh Bird. It's unfair. The team has done a great job this year so far in managing both drivers and allowing them to race. Just my $0.02 take it or leave it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
-Rubbered in racing line side (P1 & behind) should be grippier than the other
-Alonso had the inside of T1 if he can launch well
-Perez should be ahead after short run to T1, but launch will be everything.. (cont)
-KMag at P4, a bit high, but has some real pace this weekend
-Gasley could pip KMag early, and develop a bit of a train behind him
-Russel on the slippery side needs to watch out for Leclerc who is faster.
-Both CL and MV need good starts. Could jump a place each right off…
-Drivers complained of the grip off the racing line. Passing most probable between T10-11, and T16-17.
-Tyre degradation looks better? Multiple runs on soft could mean the surface is deg friendly. 1 stop prob
-Alonso is a master at keeping position. Will be a menace. 😈…
@KyleEngineers was the first I saw to mention that this decoupled underbite scoop could be “tuned” for specific conditions in the future, and I think that’s exactly what RB have done here. Cont..
The leading edge has been raised to potentially allow you to pressurize the undercut more for better mid wake control.
With the underbite, a raised LE doesn’t necessarily mean sacrificing cooling either, as you still have upper intake pulled back to pull in mass flow. Cont..
With better mid wake control from the higher LE, it’s possible the change to the outboard edge may be to soften the curl and reduce outwash that is no longer needed. Possibly some small gains that could help reduce overall drag in this region.
Good shot of the @ScuderiaFerrari double mouse hole. @KyleEngineers did a good video on how this might work to cast smaller discrete vorticity into the diffuser edge to help clean up the edge flow. Tom Talks also did a good video on this. I will link both below ⬇️
Here is the reference for the video from @KyleEngineers explaining this. Typically, smaller more discrete vortices are less prone to burst when they experience an adverse pressure gradient having their axial velocity reduced.
The video from talk talks linked here showing how the mouse hole helps to manage any vortex burst in the diffuser that would reduce your effective volume for expansion.
You can NOT seal a ground effect floor with vortices. Without sliding skirts, you WILL get inflow.
So there is no such thing as floor sealing vortices. There are, however, ways to use this inflow to your advantage.
Rear floor edge structures are created to bring some inflow vorticity into the rear floor to help stabilize and clean up the diffuser. So what can these pronounced forward edge structures do?
CFD from Latios (F1Technical)
In this study by JJN and Vyssion, these edge structures can be seen to help bring some edge load (suction) where it may not be otherwise. The core of a vortex is low pressure, so these edge vortices help with overall floor downforce.
It's very interesting when you look at a teams carbon footprint, however. @McLarenF1 produced a FANTASTIC sustainability report in 2022 highlighting some of their top carbon emitters. It was not logistics or travel. For them it was scope 3 emissions from development and mfg.
Scope 3 emissions are indirect emissions from suppliers for purchased goods, and fuel and energy related activities. For McLaren this number includes all of their racing series.
I think it would be incredibly interesting to sit down with @ZBrownCEO and @McLarenF1 as part of the @TechHeadsF1 Pod to really understand what teams are doing for sustainability. What actions are teams taking to reduce their carbon footprint, and what should F1 do?
For open wheel race cars, the wake from the front tyre is a very important thing to understand. It can impact many of the aerodynamic elements downstream. The complex structures around the tyre are 3D, and very complex #F1Tech 🧵
There are many research papers and articles studying this very phenomena. What you should know is that the wake is not stagnant but influenced by many factors like tyre rotation speed, wheel covers/no covers, tyre deflectors, etc.. #F1Tech 🧵
Previously the F1 wheels were exposed to the flow, but with the updated technical regulations using wheel covers, the aim was to reduce the dirty air from this interaction. The aim of the wheel covers was to clean up the width of the wheel wake. #F1Tech 🧵