Exciting news from @EcoHealthNYC: @NIH has reissued our @NIAIDNews grant R01AI110964 “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” 3 yrs & 2 days after it was terminated! The statement below links to the full project details: ecohealthalliance.org/2023/05/collab…
This effectively lifts the suspension on our grant that involved collaboration in China w/ Wuhan Institute of Virology, & was terminated on April 2020 ‘for convenience’. 2/ politico.com/news/2020/04/2…
In August 2022 @NIH revised their decision, terminating only the WIV subcontract. They offered to renegotiate the specific aims & we have now come to agreement w/ NIH on modified goals – details follow. 3/ ecohealthalliance.org/wp-content/upl…
The original goals were based on a very successful 5 yr project that published 18 papers incl. 2 in @Nature & a review in @CELL. Our work showed bats across Southeast Asia harbor an extraordinary diversity of SARSr-CoVs. 4/
We found that some bat-CoVs could infect human cells in the lab, cause SARS-like illness in lab animals, & evade drugs, vaccines monoclonal antibody therapies available at the time. 5/ nature.com/articles/natur…
In our studies of rural communities in China, people showed antibodies to bat-CoVs & we estimate that a median of ~66,000 people in S & SE Asia are infected by bat SARSr-CoVs each year, representing a substantial public health risk. 6/ nature.com/articles/s4146…
Original goals of renewed 5 yr grant were 1) identify diversity of bat-CoVs in bats in China 2) work in communities/clinics to identify risk behaviors/occupations linked to seropositivity or clinical illness 3) identify ‘prepandemic’ CoVs for vaccines/drug design. 7/
Our modified goals remain true to original R01 renewal: characterize CoV spillover risk to understand: Why bat-origin CoVs are such a risk for human epidemics? What drives their diversity & recombination? What behaviors put people at risk? We have 3 modified Specific Aims. 8/
Aim 1) Characterize & analyze >300 new full genomes/large genome segments of SARSr-CoVs from our archived bat samples to identify what drives CoV recombination & single out viral strains w/ high predicted risk of spillover. 9/
Aim 2) Analyze archived human samples from our prior community- & clinic-based syndromic surveillance to identify serological evidence of spillover & PCR evidence of illness. Assess which behavioral/occupational risk factors drive spillover, illness, spread. 10/
Aim 3) Using computer modeling & binding assays to characterize zoonotic potential of novel bat-CoVsthen analyze viral characteristics, host reservoir, epidemiological & ecological correlations to map hotspots of future CoV spillover risk. 11/
Our modified aims involve 1) Work at @EcoHealthNYC & @dukenus; no other foreign subcontracts. 2) No new bat/human sample collection. 3) In vitro binding assays instead of recombinant virus expts. 4) Bat-CoV culture work at BSL-3 not BSL-2. 5) Additional oversight measures. 13/
Our work will benefit public health via: 1) Maps of spillover hotspots for surveillance. 2) Data on what drives bat-CoV recombination. 3) Occupational/behavioral risk data to disrupt emergence. 4) Sequences/isolates to help design drugs/vaccines/therapies against future CoVs 14/
Our results will feed directly into the work EcoHealth Alliance is doing w/ communities on frontline in spillover hotspots to reduce high-risk contact w/ wildlife, reduce unsustainable wildlife trade & better manage our land use. 15/
Because of intense public interest in our work, we have released full details of all modifications to our original award. That includes Notice of Award from @NIH incl. budget details. 16/ ecohealthalliance.org/wp-content/upl…
Full details of the Specific Aims, Public Health Statement & Project Summary are available below, as posted on NIH RePORTER. 17/ ecohealthalliance.org/wp-content/upl…
We are grateful that this grant has been released. It’s important to remember that the termination of our original award caused a stir in the scientific community. 18/ science.org/content/articl…
Its termination was widely condemned because 1) our award fit NIAID’s & NIH’s stated goals; 2) it was independently reviewed & ranked in top 3% of proposals; 3) its specific aims targeted exactly the type of events that led to COVID-19 pandemic. 19/ science.org/content/articl…
The termination seemed to have been hastily prepared & ignored appropriate norms, as reported by @HHSOIG who called it ‘improper’ in Jan 2023 Audit report 20/ oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/re…
Subsequent actions taken on @EcoHealthNYC’s award of imposing near-impossible demands as a condition for releasing funding were also condemned 21/ wsj.com/articles/nih-p…
This is likely the first time @NIH terminated a specific grant at the orders of a US President for clearly political reasons. This led to substantial criticism, including a letter signed by 81 Nobel Laureates 22/ nlcampaigns.org/NL_letter_fina…
We therefore would like to thank many brave people who spoke out during the last 3½ yrs to support our work & defend integrity of science funding. Some became targets themselves. You have the deepest gratitude from me, my family, all @EcoHealthNYC staff & our collaborators. 23/
..& sincere thanks to all of our other supporters, donors and colleagues, including those of you brave enough to follow us on Twitter & to ignore the negativity! 28/
We acknowledge the brave donors who stepped in to fund our work despite negative press, incl. The Samuel Freeman Charitable Trust, The Whitehead Foundation, @mizliz1011 Catherine Murray Smith, Pamela Thye, The Wallace Fund, & an Anonymous Donor c/o Schwab Charitable. 29/
We've now re-started our work & look forward to answering the key questions re. bat-origin CoVs – why do they spill over & how can we disrupt them? We will share our results with you along the way & continue doing our part to protect people, wildlife & the planet 30/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This grant will support a critical step towards preventing future CoV pandemics by working with communities on the frontline, in SARSr-CoV hotspots of Southeast Asia, who have high contact with wildlife. 2/
The title of this piece belies the fact that new rules on wildlife trade in China will allow breeding of animals for fur & lucrative global fashion industry...animals including...er.. mink...& ..er.. raccoon dogs! science.org/content/articl…
Don't forget also that the wildlife trade in mammals for food is alive & well across rest of the SE Asian emerging disease hotspot region..& we're not off-the-hook either - the USA is the biggest importer of wildlife - for the pet trade. science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
That was a Policy Forum in @Science 2009, raising awareness that the wildlife trade represents a threat to global health, pandemic emergence. Was anything substantial done to reduce that risk? No. Wildlife trade was expanded to industrial scale, & remains a key pandemic driver.
What an honor! About 2x per week, the Daily Mail writes a story about COVID origins & is kind enough to refer to our work, even if it's nothing to do w/ the story they're writing. One today about Dr. Fauci grinning, & one yesterday about raccoon dogs. Here are some samples..
There are many more, each one generously pointing out how we're 'fauci-backed' or 'disgraced' or otherwise awful. Importantly, each article contains falsehoods, innacuracies, innuendo, hearsay & myth.
In this one, they (surely ironically) amplify an accusation that our scientific paper was "bullying"! That's rich, this is the same @DailyMailUK@DailyMail that hid photographers in the shrubs at my house while a reporter harrassed my family until police removed them.
Importantly, it contains preamble explaining the rationale for this unusual strategy of analyzing sequences from other groups before peer-reviewed paper published.
Conclusions are pretty straightforward - this work provides even more evidence of a so-called 'natural' zoonotic origin for COVID-19 via HSM. "In stark contrast to absence of evidence for any other ..emergence route". Couldn't agree more!
Just updating this list of scientific, verifiable evidence for “natural” origin of covid. 12+ peer-reviewed papers. Not the innuendo, hearsay, out-of-context email quotes, or hidden classified info that lab leak “theory” relies on.
Soon-to-be published data showing DNA evidence of SARSr-CoV susceptible wildlife at Huanan market around time off outbreak, w/ evidence coming to suggest they were likely shedding SC2. science.org/content/articl…