Darren Mooney Profile picture
May 8 4 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
#NowWatching "The Long Good Friday"

"The Long Good Friday" remains one of the best gangster films ever made. Even just in terms of pure filmmaking, it's a ruthlessly efficient piece of work with a powerhouse central performance from Bob Hoskins.
"The Long Good Friday" is also one of the great snapshots of the early Thatcher era, a vision of Britain on the cusp of the eighties, caught between its past and future.

Enchanted by visions of bringing American capitalism in Europe, but haunted by the legacy of its empire.
As played by Hoskins, Harold is the perfect avatar of the moment.

Harold is a gangster wearing a mask of legitimacy and aspiration, but with only a white suit jacket and a glass of prosecco separating him from his more violent impulses.

Literal gangster capitalism.
"Colin never hurt a fly. Well... only when it were necessary."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Darren Mooney

Darren Mooney Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Darren_Mooney

May 9
Broke: "Oppenheimer's politics will be 'wrong' viewed through the lens of Twitter discourse."

Woke: "'Oppenheimer' is likely about how guilty Christopher Nolan feels for reshaping pop culture with the 'Dark Knight' trilogy and studios taking exactly the wrong lessons from it."
I don't know if it will be, but Nolan's movies are often *about* his own work. Often specifically the morality of it.

Whether that's the morality of tricking the audience into catharsis ("Inception") or abandoning your family to make an epic adventure ("Interstellar").
It certainly won't be the *only* think "Oppenheimer" will be about, but the trailer vibes are very much "... we did this frankly incredible thing, but it altered the world in ways that indulged all humanity's worst self-destructive impulses."

So, y'know, it fits.
Read 7 tweets
May 8
It'll be "The Marvels" before we have any real sense of how/if "superhero fatigue" is progressing.

"Guardians", "Spider-Verse" and "The Flash" are exceptional cases in ways that will likely boost their box office. "Blue Beetle" and "Kraven" are exceptional in the opposite way.
"Guardians" is a capper to a beloved trilogy. "Spider-Verse" is, as @ScottMendelson has argued, primed to be a breakout sequel starring Spider-Man. "The Flash" has two Batmen in it.

Whereas "Blue Beetle" and "Kraven" would be tough sells to general audiences at "peak superhero."
"The Marvels" will really be the first "average" superhero film since "Quantumania."

A mid-tier property that has a proven box office track record but without a nostalgia boost, with a strong cast and corporate synergy at play, but sold primarily on the Marvel brand.
Read 4 tweets
May 8
I adore Jim Starlin's cosmic comics. I think they are massively under-appreciated as part of the evolution of seventies Marvel, and belong alongside the work of Miller or Claremont or Simonson.

Adam Warlock is one of the great Marvel characters, just like Thanos was.
The Adam Warlock who appears in "Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3" is very different from the character who appears in the comics.

But, you know what? So was the version of Thanos who appeared in "Infinity War" and "Endgame", and people seemed fine with that.
The Adam Warlock who appears in "Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3" is interesting and fun in his own right, tying well into the larger themes of the story being told.

If I want Starlin's version, I can just read Starlin's original comics again. Which you should. They're awesome.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 25, 2022
This week at @EscapistMag, I wrote about the big announcements from Marvel at #SDCC.

As the larger structure of the "Multiverse Saga" comes into focus, we can clearly see its antagonists.

But, who exactly are supposed to be the heroes of this epic?

escapistmagazine.com/marvel-mcu-mul…
The "Infinity Saga" had a clear structure.

Each phase had standalone projects, dovetailing into a crossover at the end of the phase, with the scale escalating each time.

Each "Infinity Saga" phase had a movie led by Captain America, Iron Man and Thor.

escapistmagazine.com/marvel-mcu-mul…
Which heroes are playing the roles of Steve Rogers, Tony Stark or Thor Odinson in "the Multiverse Saga", the spine that holds this mammoth story all together?

Sam Wilson is the only character to headline a project in *both* Phase Four and Phase Five.

escapistmagazine.com/marvel-mcu-mul…
Read 5 tweets
Jul 24, 2022
Since the big Marvel Studios announcements yesterday, I’ve been thinking about a very niche and very nerdy thing that bothers me about the MCU compared to the comics from which it is drawing.

Head’s up, it is very nerdy and very niche, but it still bugs me just a little bit.
So, obviously the movies theoretically draw from across the length and breadth of the source comics.

However, in reality, they are largely driven by the mainstream continuity since around 2005.

That’s where you get events like “Civil War”, “Secret Invasion”, “Dark Reign”, etc.
And you see a lot of character beats drawn from that era as well.

Spider-Man as Stark’s apprentice. Bucky as the Winter Soldier. Sam Wilson as Captain America. Jane Foster as Thor.

These are all post-2005 developments.
Read 16 tweets
Jul 22, 2022
I feel like nobody has really commented on the fact that Warner Bros. marked the streaming release of a fairly major film with an overt hit piece on that film that was very clearly sourced within the studio.

And not the sort of “gossip” pieces you saw with “Fant4stic”, etc.
That’s not conspiracy theory stuff, to be clear. It’s why that story was timed to drop when it did - to coincide with the film’s availability for digital purchase.

It’s a remarkable piece of messaging *from* (not *about*, but *from*) a major studio about one of their own films.
That piece of studio messaging neatly coincides with the upcoming San Diego Comic Con this weekend as well.

It’s fascinating how the story here is just repeating the studio’s talking points, not the studio’s efforts to construct a narrative of failure around its own film.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(