While the honorable #NCLT is pragmatic to squash the attempt of a marginal shareholder to derail a merger it has acted firmly on the true concerns
1/n
The court takes cognizance of the attempt of a marginal shareholder to acquire a minuscule stake in a public entity and an attempt to derail the broader interest of broader stakeholders in general. This would be a good reference for future cases as well.
2/n
The 67 page report is full of detailed citing, and one such citing possibly best summarizes the position of the judges in this case.
3/n
Based on the detailed analysis & independent review of the earlier valuation reports the Court has found material irregularities, non-adherence to ICAI guidelines, and lack of active verification of assets by the valuers and consideration of everything merely at face value
4/n
Further, the court has found the valuation report omitting key facts, 1) a 67% stake in a 100-acre JV valued at 581 Cr (67 acres) later dropping to a 74% stake in an 80-acre JV (59.2 acres) 2) Irregularities in NAM internal restructuring (which occurred post-deal)
5/n
Based on all of the above, the Chandigarh bench of NCLT didn't find it suitable to approve the amalgamation.
6/n
While the outcome is #IBReal minority shareholder friendly, however, the greater value would have been in the amalgamated entity.
#Embassy would certainly fight it out further at NCLAT, given all the precedence, unlikely the merger would be approved in its present form.
7/n
Given the long legal process ahead & further opportunity & capital loss for retail shareholders. salvaging the residual capital appears to be the most prudent
It is unlikely #Embassy will let this one slip out and the possibility of other suitors for #IBReal appears remote
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh