The Palletized Field Artillery launcher #PFAL seems perfect for NATO and particularly 🇺🇸🇬🇧 🇩🇪collaboration. This could be something rapidly pursued and fielded as the US Army has already done initial design, prototype production & initial testing.
(Notional art via US Army)
I had a few 🧵about #PFALS on my previous a/c. The launcher consists of an erectable palletized mechanical structure, FCS , Power Management System. and is capable of firing all current Multiple Launch Rocket System Family of Munitions & missiles including GMLRS/ER & PrSM.
One big advantage of PFALS is its cost effectiveness & scalability. It being compatible with the Palletized Load System means that there are endless possibilities with pre-positioned stockpiles & turning PLS into field artillery launchers as needed. It also complicates targeting.
DARPA's prototype Operations Fires #OpFires hypersonic system launcher follows of a similar path of utilizing a palletized launcher, PS and fire control solution that can be loaded up on an existing compatible load system without needing a completely new launcher program.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is an important point. While attention is usually focused on a new interceptor, its performance & potential, what often gets overlooked is the incremental enhancements made to the overall system to prepare for the new missile, or to keep pace with the threat. See 📸👇
👆was published in the mid 1990s just as PATRIOT was preparing to introduce the PAC-3. As included in the paper, at the time, one of the biggest gains was the ability to emplace launchers up to 30 km from the RS. The Army's IAMD-BCS #IBCS extends that to 150 km via IFCN relays.
Wish I could share some of my past threads on this capability. Here's a snippet of what this capability (IBCS / IFCN relays) does to Army's Air and Missile Defense capability. A-IAMD is essentially fully replacing PATRIOT. I'll post more below.