Jan Geert Hiddink Profile picture
May 10 6 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Remember the claims that 'Bottom trawling releases as much carbon as global air travel'? It turns out that these simplistic estimates have overestimated CO2 release by two to three orders of magnitude
nature.com/articles/s4158… Image
Today we publish a paper showing that Sala et al. massively overestimate the reactivity of buried carbon. nature.com/articles/s4158… Image
This shouldn't come as a surprise, because the empirical evidence on the impacts of trawling on #BlueCarbon is very mixed. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
A review of 49 studies investigating carbon stocks after trawling revealed highly mixed results, with 61% of studies reporting no significant effect, 29% reporting lower OC stocks and 10% reporting higher stocks. Image
In conclusion, we currently do not know enough about the impact of trawling on seabed carbon to make robust global projections. Even initial plans for the management of bottom trawling for carbon benefits require estimates that are of the correct order of magnitude. Image
This version is not behind a paywall: rdcu.be/dbPz8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jan Geert Hiddink

Jan Geert Hiddink Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Macomabalthica

May 12
You may have noted that there is >2years between the submission and publication of our 'Matters Arising' paper. This has exposed the difficulties of publishing pieces criticising high profile papers in Nature. A🧵...
rdcu.be/dbPz8 Image
The original manuscript was reviewed, and one reviewer strongly agreed with us that the Sala et al. paper has some major flaws in the modelling of carbon dynamics.
Nature agreed, but decided that publication of our manuscript was not justified, because on the basis of referee feedback the authors would need to correct their paper, and this would serve to address our central concern. And nothing would be left to publish for us.
Read 9 tweets
May 10
We are concerned that Sala et al. overestimate trawl-induced CO2 release, because their model uses a reactivity estimated for highly reactive carbon delivered recently to the sediment surface, and apply it to bulk sediment which is known to have a much lower reactivity Image
One way in which the overestimate becomes obvious is through the validation of their model. They say their model predicts the red outer circle below. But you cannot measure just that red part separately. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(