My next session at #AAPOR is “Things that Divide Us: Ideology, Identification, and Information”. The first talk is “Fake News Interventions: Effective for Both Strong and Weakly Identified Partisans?” presented by Joseph Sandor.
Joseph first explains that while people have a motivation to share accurate information on social media sometimes people share things that are inaccurate. Joseph is presenting the results of an experiment where users rated a headline’s accuracy before sharing. #AAPOR
Next Joseph is walking through the literature on why people share fake news and how sometimes people are motivated to share fake news for political reasons. #AAPOR
Now Joseph shows the experiment design to see the effect of accuracy nudge and identity manipulation. The experiment was conducted on Mechanical Turk with an even number of Republican and Democrats. #AAPOR Image
There was not support for the hypothesis that accuracy nudges work or that partisan identity threat mattered. #AAPOR
Next we have “Measuring Susceptibility to News Misinformation By Political Party and Media Consumption” by Linley Sanders of @YouGovAmerica
Linley starts by explaining that the purpose of this study to see if American can identify real articles and fake articles by headlines. The fake articles were AI generated. The study was conducted on about 1500 US adults on YouGov panel. The headlines were randomized. #AAPOR
About 70% of headlines were correctly identified. There are differences in accuracy of detecting of age, political party, news attention, and news outlet they consume. They who consume news on social media did perform worse than those who use more traditional sources. #AAPOR
Next we have “Are Centrists Even Real? Combining Survey Self-Reports and Web Tracking Data to Improve Our Understanding of Left-Right Ideology” by Oriol Bosch. #AAPOR
Oriol first explains how web tracking data is and how it can be used to measure news consumption and it’s affect on political opinion. Oriol mentions that tracking data can help supplement self reports. #AAPOR
Oriol says his presentation focuses on Spain because the media outlets are polarized across the political spectrum. The tracking panelists are placed an a social economic and political spectrum. #AAPOR
Next Oriol compares the results from the web tracking and surveys and the results were similar but survey is a better predictor of political ideology. Next Oriol discusses a hidden markov model to better classify the panelists. #AAPOR
The survey data does seem to do a better job at identifying political ideology over the web tracking data. However Oriol mentioned that the tracking data is an alternative to surveys but surveys are better. This his twitter for reference. @orioljbosch #AAPOR
Next we have “Mass Media and Spatial Polarization Examining the Relationship between Media Consumption, Identities Connected to Place and Sentiments Towards Rural and Urban Americans.” By David Coppini.
First David provides an overview about the rural urban divide and social identity framework. David states his presentation focus in the rural urban divide. #AAPOR
The study was conducted with @ipsosus KnowledgePanel in 2019. The survey measured media consumption, rural/urban identities and animosity towards people in rural/urban areas. #AAPOR
The studies did find a urban/rural divide. #AAPOR
The next presentation is “Mass Media and Spatial Polarization Examining the Relationship between Media Consumption, Identities Connected to Place and Sentiments Towards Rural and Urban Americans” presented by David Rothschild. #AAPOR
This presentation is about getting a comprehensive view of political identity then a more basic political identification. Questions include what demographic features matter the most to you? The data comes from Prodege with 2000 respondents. #AAPOR
The models include multi-class logistic regression with cross validation to predict political preferences with different demographics. #AAPOR
David says he will focus on predicting if people are Republicans and Democrats. Adding expanded demographics and identity questions improves the accuracy of predicting party affiliation. #AAPOR
#AAPOR tagging @DavMicRot
David now is summarizing his results. There was significant variation in prediction across across different groups.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Brittany Alexander (Stats PhD Defended)

Dr. Brittany Alexander (Stats PhD Defended) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @balexanderstats

May 10
My next session is “Like it or Not? Survey Recruitment and Data Collection using Social Media”. Presented by @trentbuskirk #AAPOR
Trent starts by saying this survey is a pilot study to conceptually cover individuals who have professional experience about privacy. Trent first starts with a literature review of using social media as a method of recruitment. #AAPOR
The sample was partially sourced by twitter users who tweeted certain keywords about privacy. A random sample of 1680 users were identified. #AAPOR
Read 31 tweets
May 10
I’m excited to be at #aapor this year. The first session I’m attending (and live tweeting) is “Assessing the Polls: Measuring Bias and Vote Choice”.
The first presentation is “It's Not Personal: Evaluating the Impact of Asking for Voters By Name” presented by Travis Brodbeck and Madeline Harland of @SienaResearch.
Sienna college polls have been some of the most accurate and are based on the L2 voter file and a likely voter model to determine the likelihood someone will vote. #AAPOR
Read 38 tweets
Nov 10, 2020
I’ve looked into statistics about voter fraud and I find it hard to believe there is the necessary level of voter fraud to flip this election. If Biden wins AZ and GA you have to overturn the results of 37 electors. The easiest way to do that is to contest GA, AZ, PA.
Biden is ahead by this many votes in these states:
GA: 12338
AZ: 14746
PA: 45103
Total: 72187
Now these aren’t official numbers but bare with me here. So we need about 72k fraudulent votes all for Biden to flip the election. That number needs to be put in perspective.
A Heritage Foundation study found 1298 proven cases of voter fraud going back to 1982 in all different types of elections. This includes fake registration that may not have resulted in voting. There may be unproven cases not counted.
heritage.org/voterfraud/#ch…
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(