emptywheel Profile picture
May 11 5 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Here's something I want to know abt CNN Trump bonanza: Who decided @kaitlancollins would do it? Did Trump demand it? Or did CNN think the optics of Trump bullying their beautiful lead female anchor for an hour would be good for the brand?
Also, is it true that @ChrisLichtCNN did prep with Collins, rather than actual news producers?

If so, the willful optics of this--setting Trump up to deliver a very gendered bullying as surrogate for "news"--is all the more troubling.
This is not a dig on Collins. @jaketapper would have done no better at disrupting Trump's gaslighting.

But the optics would have been different, bc it would not have been a symbolic domination of a beautiful woman in lieu of news or truth.
One problem with coverage of Trump is many reporters covering him are so giddy for the access they don't realize that Trump will NEVER be about truth -- you will only ever be a participant in his reality show -- but is instead about staging power relations.
And the power relation of being ABOVE truth, of being able to bully journalists, has always been utterly central to Trump's brand. Making that gendered, as Licht chose to do, is all the more valuable for Trump bc there's something sexualized about his power.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with emptywheel

emptywheel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emptywheel

May 11
I feel like the media is making a grave category error with Trump and the Town Hall.

Yes, he lied non-stop. But fact-checking, while necessary, is insufficient, because Trump's power depends on his performed ability to defy truth.
It is senseless to talk about Trump in terms of "policy" -- unless, by policy, you mean authoritarianism built off policed loyalty and gleeful abuse of vulnerable people.
It is senseless to raise Trump's specific legal woes. The stakes of this election are his goal--significantly pursued in his first Admin--of replacing rule of law with mob enforcement.
Read 6 tweets
May 10
BREAKING: @Jim_Jordan spends 65 pages demanding that 51 private citizens be silenced.

When he said "weaponization," he knew what he planned.
@Jim_Jordan Among other things this "report" does is provide proof that those who signed the letter believed what they wrote--that the "laptop" had the hallmarks of a RU info operation.

Jordan has, in fact, proved the letter was TRUE. Image
@Jim_Jordan Jordan also provided proof that the former spooks took care to distinguish between info op and false -- again, proving that many claims Jordan and others have made were false.

Is Jordan so dumb he doesn't realize he has proven himself wrong? Image
Read 19 tweets
May 9
Here's a question @CNN should ask Trump: So are you glad that your penis is so small that E Jean Carroll couldn't see whether you had penetrated her, thereby dodging the rape charge?
@CNN "Do you think you were saved from a rape verdict by the fact that your penis is so small?"

"Is that why you're so obsessed with Hunter Biden's dick pics?"
@CNN "How does Melania feel about the fact that your settlements with various sex partners and victims will now break 6 digits?"
Read 4 tweets
May 9
The GOP pitch to beat Joe Biden is, 100% literally, hoaxes that never amounted to anything when they tried them in 2020.

"Vote for our guy, we still have only make-believe reasons not to vote for Joe."
DEFEAT BIDEN BECAUSE 50 FORMER SPOOKS EXPRESSED AN OPINION IN A LETTER THAT WAS MORE CREDIBLE THAN DRUNKEN RUDY'S OPINION.
DEFEAT BIDEN BECAUSE ONLY ONE WOMAN, NOT THIRTY, EVER MADE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST BIDEN.
Read 7 tweets
May 4
I feel like a lot of commentary about the Tucker Carlson text is missing important context. Many don't even mention that Tucker sent it the day after Trump's coup attempt (NYT did, Erik Wemple here did not).

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/… Image
Fewer still are noting that "video of people fighting on the street in Washington" from a few weeks before the January 6 attack is highly likely to be from the December MAGA March, and therefore that the fight in question is one of the ones featuring the Proud Boys.
This one, for example, featured prominently in the Proud Boys seditious conspiracy trial.

Read 7 tweets
May 3
WaPo's 1800-word, 4 reporter story on the upcoming decision on whether to charge Hunter or not says it matters bc it'll affect Biden's campaign.

washingtonpost.com/national-secur… Image
Here's WaPo's front page, with the Hunter story on it.

Can someone point me to where the story on the rape trial, the one in which TRUMP, not his son, is a defendant? Image
How about the news that Trump's long-time digial media guru spent all day before Jack Smith's grand jury yesterday (on a Tuesday)?

Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(