Companies in India have been at the forefront of socially-relevant advertising that affirms respect for minorities and human rights. A noteworthy, commendable practice that companies from elsewhere should follow. 1/n @ihrb@lawsofrule@hkaur0304@houdart@ARamasastry
True, there has been backlash, as Tanishq and others have faced, and self-righteous socially conservative jingoist groups have called for 'boycotts,' as @IndiaStarbucks@StarbucksIndia is now facing. But it must persevere. 2/n
Through concepts such as ardhanarishwara, social acceptance of trans community, even veneration, are as much part of Indian traditions, as is the opposition to trans communities, including violation of rights. India has always lived with extreme contrasts. 3/n
Its traditions revere a warrior goddess like Kali and at the same time its social order discriminates against women; it is the land where opposite contrasts coexist, confounding those who want to make easy generalisations. 4/n
In 2018, I had done a podcast with Laya Vasudevan on the transgender rights case in India, which you can listen here: voices.ihrb.org/episodes/podca… 5/n
Parliamentary parties seeking new leaders is not an unprecedented phenomenon. Tories have been doing it too often lately, but Gordon Brown too became PM after Blair left. 1/2
It is not so bizarre; party members often vote for a charismatic/extreme candidate (see some US primaries as another example). MPs know they need to secure broader support to win elections (and not only appeal to the loyalists) and hence they opt for more electable candidates.
None of this is to suggest that the inheritor, presumed to be more acceptable to the general population, will get the vote. British Asians might like the idea of a British Asian PM, but they vote based on their interests, where Sunak's ethnicity is only one of the many factors.