The 🇺🇸 Army is presently in the middle of its phased approach to reconstituting its maneuver SHORAD capability. This consists fielding 3 MSHORAD Increments. 🧵👇
Inc 1 focuses on kinetic (30 mm Prox + Stinger missiles) low-altitude air threats to include FW, RW, & G-3 UAS.
Increment 2, is currently being put through its paces with the US Army's 4-60ADAR fielding the system. It consists of a 50kw High Energy Laser combined with EO/IR and RF sensors. Inc 2 focuses on G-1, 2 and 3 UAS, RW & RAM threats
The Increment 3 effort is presently focused on upgrading the kinetic Inc. 1 system with more capable weapons, sensor enhancements, and 2nd gen 30 mm multi-mode prox munition.
There is a strong possibility that the Inc 2 - Directed Energy #MSHORAD effort evolves to include other DE systems besides the 50kW #HEL. To support this, industry has begun testing a solid-state #GaN based High-Power Microwave system compatible with #MSHORAD.
The Army is moving fast on the #MSHORAD effort. The service received sign off on its Directed requirements in FY-2018, and has already fielded 8 platoons of the Inc 1 system in Europe with more on the way. Overall, Army is pursuing a force structure of up to 9 MSHORAD battalions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Palletized Field Artillery launcher #PFAL seems perfect for NATO and particularly 🇺🇸🇬🇧 🇩🇪collaboration. This could be something rapidly pursued and fielded as the US Army has already done initial design, prototype production & initial testing.
(Notional art via US Army)
I had a few 🧵about #PFALS on my previous a/c. The launcher consists of an erectable palletized mechanical structure, FCS , Power Management System. and is capable of firing all current Multiple Launch Rocket System Family of Munitions & missiles including GMLRS/ER & PrSM.
One big advantage of PFALS is its cost effectiveness & scalability. It being compatible with the Palletized Load System means that there are endless possibilities with pre-positioned stockpiles & turning PLS into field artillery launchers as needed. It also complicates targeting.
This is an important point. While attention is usually focused on a new interceptor, its performance & potential, what often gets overlooked is the incremental enhancements made to the overall system to prepare for the new missile, or to keep pace with the threat. See 📸👇
👆was published in the mid 1990s just as PATRIOT was preparing to introduce the PAC-3. As included in the paper, at the time, one of the biggest gains was the ability to emplace launchers up to 30 km from the RS. The Army's IAMD-BCS #IBCS extends that to 150 km via IFCN relays.
Wish I could share some of my past threads on this capability. Here's a snippet of what this capability (IBCS / IFCN relays) does to Army's Air and Missile Defense capability. A-IAMD is essentially fully replacing PATRIOT. I'll post more below.