"The potential climate impact of #SolarGeoengineering is examined in a recent study using climate model simulations by artificially reducing the incoming solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere." #ClimateEngineering #SolarShading
Results discussed in a🧵 1/9
"Climate scenario simulations reveal that a doubling of atmospheric CO2 induces a surface temperature rise which is amplified over the poles primarily during the respective winter. The warming also causes intensification & poleward shift of the global precipitation pattern." 2/9
"In the model, a 2.1% globally uniform #SolarReduction can largely compensate the global mean warming caused by a doubling of CO2." 3/9
This study finds that "#SolarShading is efficient to restore the temp at the region where the background sunshine is strong, regionally at low-latitudes, seasonally during summer. A 3.6% solar reduction in the tropics can largely reduce the tropical #GlobalWarming as well." 4/9
"However, it reduces the precipitation at the central tropics, while increase the precipitation over the monsoon region." 5/9
"Comparatively, a 14% #SolarReduction over the #poles can effectively prevent the polar summer temp increase & sea-ice retreat. However, caused by the increased temp gradient, polar #SolarShading increases the storm activity at high latitudes, especially during summer." 6/9
The simulations of this study show that "#SolarShading could be an effective way to stabilize the #polar cryosphere. Nevertheless, it has a strong impact on the hydrological cycle & provides a heterogenous regional climate signal."
7/9
Read the open-access study (Preprint) entitled: The effect of global and regional solar shading onclimate: A simulation study" here ⬇️ researchsquare.com/article/rs-285…
🚨How does #SolarGeoengineering affect air pollution & public health?
New study using a cutting-edge Earth system model shows that #SAI has only modest effects on PM₂.₅ & ozone-related mortality & these impacts are mostly due to climate shifts, not aerosol deposition.🧵1/8
2/ Using CESM2-WACCM6 simulations across three scenarios (SSP2-4.5 baseline, ARISE-SAI-1.5, ARISE-SAI-1.0), the study quantifies global mortality attributable to ozone (O₃) & fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) under future SAI deployment targeting 1.5°C and 1.0°C warming levels.
3/ Findings:
In the ARISE-SAI-1.5 scenario, maintaining global mean temp at 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels via SAI results in:
- 1.26% reduction in ozone-related mortality
- 0.86% increase in PM₂.₅-related mortality during 2060–2069, relative to SSP2-4.5.
📰 Here's your round-up of top #CarbonDioxideRemoval News / Developments from this week (21-27 July 2025):
🔗:
🧵0/22
Chestnut Carbon secured up to $210M in non-recourse financing, led by J.P. Morgan for its afforestation project, marking a first-of-its-kind deal in the US carbon removal space.
🚨Scientists have discovered a common soil bacterium, Bacillus megaterium, that can rapidly remove CO2 from the atmosphere by transforming it into solid limestone (calcium carbonate) within 24 hours, without creating toxic byproducts.
#CDR #CarbonMineralization
DETAILS🧵1/8
2/ Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) is a technique where microbes precipitate CaCO₃, often used in eco-friendly building materials.
Most MICP uses urease to break down urea, which produces ammonium, a problematic byproduct.
3/ Bacillus megaterium is unique in a sense, it contains both urease and carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzymes. The latter allows it to fix CO₂ directly without needing urea.
But which pathway dominates? This study investigated that.
🚨Solar Geoengineering (#SRM) may seem cheap (~$18B/yr) to cool the planet, but when you factor in societal risks, political instability & sudden climate rebounds, the true cost may far exceed technical estimates from both moral & practical standpoints, says a new study.
🧵1/11
2/ SRM often gets touted as cheap even “pennies per ton” compared to the hundreds of $/ton needed for large-scale CDR.
But these estimates usually ignore the real-world costs of deploying SRM in a politically fractured and climate-damaged world.
3/ The authors outline four cost domains that traditional SRM estimates often miss:
1️⃣ Compensation for harms
2️⃣ International coordination
3️⃣ Domestic political feasibility
4⃣ Termination Shock
Each could add major financial & political costs. Details below:
SeaO2, in collaboration with TU Delft, University of Twente, and NERA secured nearly $2M for a seawater-to-e-SAF project via TKI Energy and Industry program.