Joey Fox Profile picture
May 15 6 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
The biggest medical failure of the pandemic was denying that COVID is airborne.

The biggest engineering failure of the pandemic was not providing a clean air delivery rate required for mitigating airborne disease. That failure has been addressed. We now have good values. 🧵
1/6 Image
ASHRAE 241 Draft Review (Not finalized)
10-90 liters/second/person, depending on the risk of the environment.

Equivalent ACH was calculated based on occupant density in other standards. Higher density increases equivalent ACH.

2/6
osr.ashrae.org/Online-Comment… Image
CDC - 5 air changes per hour

3/6

cdc.gov/coronavirus/20… Image
@O_S_P_E - minimum of 6 air changes per hour (capped at 2.7m/9' ceiling)
5/6
These rates are all pretty similar. The ASHRAE rates are slightly different because they use per person and it can significantly affect ACH from occupant density. Overall, they are all in agreement that current rates are way too low. The clean air revolution is under way.
6/6

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joey Fox

Joey Fox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joeyfox85

May 17
Looking at the core recommendations for @O_S_P_E IAQ Advisory Group, it does a fantastic job at finding the middle of the road between the recent ASHRAE Standard 241 Draft and CDC Guidelines. It also addresses other IAQ issues. Here's how. 🧵
1/7 Image
With the new CDC guidelines, they recommend 5 air changes per hour, where OSPE recommends 6. These numbers very close. However, they admit there are issues:
1. Places with high ceilings have rates too high
2. High risk spaces will have rates too low
2/7
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20… Image
ASHRAE's guidance is more accurate from a physics perspective. Infectious aerosols are generated by people, not by room volume, so a rate per person is better. It's not intended as general guidance and has high rates in healthcare and high dense areas.
osr.ashrae.org/Online-Comment…
3/7 Image
Read 7 tweets
May 14
Overview of Control of Infectious Aerosols
ASHRAE Standard 241P

ASHRAE released a standard for review. It can have significant impacts on designs, operations of new buildings how we move forward. Here's an overview of what's in it.
1/25
osr.ashrae.org/Online-Comment… Cover page for standard 241
To start, many of my threads in the past years are in line with the standard. After fighting all the misinformation, it was really cathartic reading though it. Note: This is not the final release, so things can change.

I predicted this by the way!

2/25
The scope is specifically about mitigating long range transmission. Nothing for short range transmission.

Right at the beginning, it gives you the equivalent outdoor air rates. They are pretty good.

3/25
Read 25 tweets
May 14
ASHRAE Standard 241P Control of Infectious Aerosols
Infection Risk Management Mode (IRMM)
osr.ashrae.org/Online-Comment…

Understanding IRMM is essential to understanding what we can expect from buildings in the future. Here's a brief description. 🧵
1/9
Need to start with caveats, this is only the advisory public review and not the finished standard. I've read the standard twice and this thread is based on my understanding of the intent. I'll correct it if I'm wrong.
2/9
The rates provided were surprisingly high, but buildings will not be required to always provide those rates. They will only provide them when in Infection Risk Management Mode (IRMM).

In 9.1.3 it defines 3 modes:
Normal, IRMM, Temporary Shutdown (not addressed yet)
3/9
Read 9 tweets
May 12
ASHRAE Control of Infectious Aerosols - Equivalent Outdoor Air Rates

The new standard is out and can be found here. osr.ashrae.org/default.aspx

Here's a quick review of the rates that are recommended.

1/5
The recommended equivalent outdoor air rates can be found in Table 5-1 on page 4. They are overall very high. For reference, WHO recommends 10 litres per second (lps)/person and OSPE and Lancet recommend 13.5 lps/person.

2/5 Image
Using standard densities from 62.1 at full occupancy, I've converted these rates into air changes per hour and what CO2 level you would expect to have if outdoor air was the only tool used (it won't be, but this is just for reference).
3/5 Image
Read 7 tweets
May 12
ASHRAE just developed a standard to mitigate airborne diseases. Once it's published, I'll do some threads explaining it. For now, I'll give a brief history behind this. 🧵

1/7
ASHRAE has had a standard for indoor air quality for many years (called 62.1). One major problem is that it never took into account airborne diseases. Andrew Persily explained why in last month's ASHRAE magazine.

2/7 Despite what we have been h...
Then an airborne pandemic hit us and we had no standards. ASHRAE setup the Epidemic Task Force. It gave advice on best practices for buildings and how to improve ventilation and filtration, but did not establish any standard.

3/7
Read 7 tweets
May 11
I've written a post about air distribution. It seems like a technical and minor aspect of air quality, but it's extremely important. So much of the misinformation and bad decisions during the pandemic relate to misunderstanding air distribution.
1/15
itsairborne.com/air-distributi…
Air distribution refers to how air mixes and is supplied throughout the space. You can get clean air into a room, but you only care about what people are breathing in. When that clean air bypasses people and gets exhausted, it's a useless waste of energy.
2/15 Image
The goal in the vast majority of ventilation systems is to have the air properly mixed. It ensures the clean air dilutes all the pollutants and there are no spaces with higher pollutant concentration. A proper design with diffusers can achieve this.
3/15 Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(