Florida just banned everything I teach at the university level. If legislators bothered to take my class, they’d learn that backlash events like this always coincide with white supremacist vigilante & state violence. Then again, they may already know.
Students tell me they wish that they’d been taught abt histories of inequality in the US before college. They often say they feel like they’ve been lied to, well, bc they have. They don’t *want* to learn racist mythology—they want to understand the world as it actually exists.
There’s a reason that white conservatives want to hide the actual history of white conservatism from the many systems of racial plunder, torture, massacre, & genocide through their contemporary iterations in “school choice,” gentrification, or the “war on drugs.”
It’s no accident, in fact, that these book, content, instructor, & course bans coincide with an increasingly fascist Republican Party, one working overtime to undermine voting access, to expand public corruption, & to attack & eliminate their political opponents.
Or you can see the ravages of white conservatism through the lens of land & housing in the excellent Plot of Land podcast, to which I was proud to contribute. plotofland.monumentlab.com
There’s a reason they don’t want us to know this stuff: they don’t want us to know that they’re doing it right now—at this very moment—expanding the power & violence of the racial state. We’ve got to stop these monsters before it’s too late.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The dumbass hot takes by COVID minimizers make me so angry as someone w Long COVID, not only bc of the debilitating nature of that UNTREATABLE condition, but also for the underlying claim that we took too many precautions to preserve life & health in 2020. Despicable!
You are now (thankfully) less likely to die in the immediate term from a COVID infection. You DO STILL have a relatively high risk (25-30%) of getting longer term symptoms & disability from even mild COVID infections, as I had.
We actually don’t know, other than high incidence of heart attack & stroke in “post” COVID patients, whether or not there’s a longer term risk of death from COVID, but again, it’s quite clear that there’s a high risk of disability without any lasting natural/“herd” immunity.
1 Calls for violence against opponents
2 Book, content & course bans
3 Attacks on LGBTQ folks & repro health
4 Voter suppression, anti-protest & reprisal bills
5 Rising hate crime & political violence
& then finger-wags calling it fascism.
I mean even if you know jack shit abt historical fascist movements—as Tom Nichols appears to—maybe under those circumstances just consider sitting it out? Like, who exactly are you (Tom Nichols) trying to help here?
There's a word in French that describes people like that (Tom Nichols). That word is Vichy.
Winning the fight against fascism requires that we work together to create a livable future. To that end, I'm sharing my remarks from a carceral studies conference bc understanding the carceral state isn't just an academic project, but one of survival. drwilliamhorne.substack.com/p/incarceratio…
I left some things open for discussion when I wrote this, but want to add that incarceration & work really are intertwined, w/incarceration rates tracking w changes in automating, subcontracting, offshoring, & unemployment.
Through that lens, mass incarceration as a set of policy priorities is much more about work outside of prison walls than anything else—a form of discipline that works *alongside* the demands of the manager, the boss, & the owner.
Just white woman Michelle Tandler claiming that her fear justifies lynching, reproducing exactly—almost word-for-word—the famed “lynch a thousand times a week” speech of suffragist Rebecca Latimer Felton.
You can read it above, but I want to make sure we see how suffragist Felton justified lynching:
“When there is not enough religion in the pulpit to organize a crusade against sin; nor justice in the court house to promptly punish crime...
"...nor manhood enough in the nation to put a sheltering arm about innocence and virtue----if it needs lynching to protect woman’s dearest possession form the ravening human beasts----then I say lynch, a thousand times a week if necessary.”
Reading this brilliant Saidiya Hartman line in a whole new light amid the GOP backlash against the 2020 BLM protests: “Suppose the recognition of humanity held out the promise not of liberating the flesh or redeeming one’s suffering but rather intensifying it?”
We see this pattern time & again, whether its the white supremacist violence in response to emancipation & Black enfranchisement, the lynching & massacres in response to Black organizing, or the Klan/Citizens' Council terrorism campaign in the aftermath of Brown.
Hartman points to something almost hardwired into the state—that white American recognition of Black suffering tends to inspire 1) public emotive responses & 2) intensifications of anti-Black violence & exploitation.
The reason lies in the narrow way they define the nation—in this case around racist & cartoonish worship of The Founders—that requires total subordination of all others for the nation to fully exist.
Do these myths stand up to scrutiny? Not in the slightest, which is why GOP bills like HB999 would in effect ban the study of history entirely, bc the fascists are totally unconcerned with the actual history but rather w racist myths upon which they can base their power.