No evidence of conspiracy between @realDonaldTrump and the Russians existed prior to the July 28, 2016 tip from the Australians.
3/
Durham describes what can only be described as a corrupt @FBI.
Andrew McCabe passed the information onto @petestrzok who, without even talking with the source of that information, immediately opened the #CrossfireHurricane investigation.
4/
I'm impressed that Durham did not white wash his report. He lists the different instances when @HillaryClinton should have been investigated, but because the @BarackObama administration wanted another Democrat in office, they buried those investigations.
Durham describes how on one or more occasions, when Carter Page or @GeorgePapa19 made statements which would help exonerate them ('exculpatory evidence'), the FBI simply withheld that information from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).
7/
Durham goes a step further in damning the @FBI by pointing out that during the course of his investigation, one @FBI lawyer was prosecuted and convicted of falsifying a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application to the FISC.
8/
Background information on the Steele Dossier.
9/
Durham states that the @FBI was aware that the information in the Steele Dossier had also be released to the press. In other words, they could not use the information released by the press as corroboration of the Dossier, when they were one and the same.
10/
Durham states how one allegation in particular was used in all 4 FISA applications against Carter Page. He goes on to recreate that allegation in full, and it reads like a discount Hollywood monologue.
11/
According to Durham,
1. The @FBI tried, but failed to corroborate any of the main allegations of the Dossier 2. Steele relied almost entirely on a singleRussian national source named Igor Danchenko
12/
When the @FBI finally interviewed Danchenko, he could not corroborate any of Steele's allegations in his Dossier, instead characterizing his conversations with his sub-sources as 'rumor & speculation'. The @FBI disclosed none of this to the FISC.
13/
In its first FISA application, the @FBI told the FISC that Danchenko was based in Russia. When the @FBI learned that he in fact lived in Washington, DC, it never corrected this fact in its subsequent 3 FISA applications to the FISC.
14/
I don't know what to make of this, to be honest. Danchenko is found to be unable to corroborate anything, the @FBI conceals key parts of his testimony to the FISC, then they bring him on as a Confidential Human Source (CHS). Reminds me of The Pelican Brief.
15/
In 2008, Danchenko attempted to bribe fellow employees at the @BrookingsInst for classified information. The @FBI opened an investigation & discovered he had ties to Russian intelligence officers. What's more damning is that in 2017 the @FBI was aware of this investigation.
16/
I'm assuming Durham has intentionally withheld more details on this for a reason. Either he believes investigation into this matter is beyond the scope of this document, or he didn't want to go down a rabbit hole of implicating @BarackObama/@real_GeorgeBush in this scandal.
17/
In closing the issue of the Steele Dossier, Durham says that they found no evidence that the @FBI even tried to address Danchenko's 2008 espionage matter before bringing him on as a Confidential Human Source (CHS)
18/
Durham next points out that the @FBI never disclosed Danchenko's unresolved 2008 espionage issue to the @TheJusticeDept, who, therefore, could not and did not disclose it to the FISC in their Carter Page FISA application.
19/
Finally, Durham points out the obvious fact that anyone who has ever watched a Bond movie could tell you: a Russian with ties to Russian Intelligence is probably feeding you Russian disinformation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@TheRealTedKuntz, President of @VaccineChoiceCA, drops its case against the government and they explain why in plain English (b/c our courts are broken).
What @TheRealTedKuntz is trying to say here is that the judges refused to listen to anything going against the main stream media narrative (ie. taking judicial notice of the mainstream story).
3/
Here, @TheRealTedKuntz is saying that the judges believed whatever the government said, and refused to believe they could be wrong.
First off, during the protests in Ottawa, there was an attempt to get the protestors under charges blocking critical infrastructure, like highways, which was one step below terrorism.
3/
After 4 years of covid where appointed judges stripped us of what we thought were God given rights, I don't want to give them any more power.
Let's go over the BC Supreme Court decision concerning the issue of the reasonableness of Bonnie Henry's October 5, 2023 health orders and whether it was reasonable for her to maintain that we are still in a state of emergency for covid 19 as of that date.
2/
As per usual, the title page is completely incomprehensible.
3/
Looks like the suit was brought by terminated healthcare workers, or what we generally just refer to as 'terminated nurses'.
The Office of Federal Housing Advocate (FHA) is talking about nationalization of housing, which is what the @bcndp are pushing for here in BC as well, but they are hiding behind the phrase 'low income housing'.
3/
The government destroys the economy, causing the rich to invest in land as a safe hedge, which drives up the cost of housing, which pisses off the poor, so the government regulates the rich until they, too, are poor. It's the socialism spiral.
There's a lot of buzz around this @rcmpgrcpolice document that is warning about civil unrest in Canada in the next 5 years, so let's go straight to the source.
I swore I would stop wasting my time analyzing the @liberal_party tyrannical bills, but @viraniarif's Bill C-63 is so disturbing that I couldn't resist.
I'm going to assume that the first two goals of this Act empower the government to go after its political opponents, and the third part turns social media companies into the surveillance arm of the state
3/
As a people, we look back and ask what our politicians were thinking when they introduced bad bills, like the 1917 War Income Tax Act. But here we see the growth of government power in real time. We ought to feel shame for what we are unleashing on future generations.