Keith Woods Profile picture
May 16 25 tweets 12 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
It is difficult to overstate how much everything since 1945 is shaped by the spectre of the Holocaust.

The period since is the story of the religious underpinning of the West shifting from Christianity to a new foundation built on a single commandment: "never again":

1/25 🧵 Image
2/25 Take Karl Popper, the intellectual godfather of neoliberalism:

Popper was compelled to write The Open Society and Its Enemies during WW2, motivated by rebuilding Western civilization as an open society to ensure those horrors would not be seen again

3/25 George Soros was Popper's student at the London School of Economics, and named his Open Society Institute after Popper's book.

Soros' entire project is devoted to using civil society networks to enshrine pluralism and wither away the intolerant forces of "populism" ImageImage
4/25 Post-war liberalism moved in the direction Popper desired.

A liberalism based on natural rights shifted to one focused on empiricism, consensus, progressive social engineering, and a distrust of "the strong gods" or any metaphysical input in the political. Image
5/25 Another influential book in forming the post-war liberal consensus was Friedrich Hayek's The Road to Serfdom.

It was Hayek who got Popper a publisher for his book, seeing him as a useful ally in his own libertarian, anti-ideological approach to politics. ImageImage
6/25 Hayek was also motivated by identifying the roots of fascism, but rather than attacking the roots of Western philosophy, his focus is on collectivism.

It is the socialists, national or international, with their lie of a "common good" who are responsible for totalitarianism Image
7/25 The social planners of the post-war world would set about removing once and for all the roots of the closed society which had led to the horrors of the war.

First to go had to be the biological basis for race which was central to Nazism. See thread:

8/25 A related strong God - Nationalism - also had to be dismantled.

Whereas Nationalism had once been seen as a natural phenomenon, and "nation" was identified with a distinct ethnic group or race, academic studies of Nationalism now began to deconstruct it along Marxist lines. Image
9/25 Many of the most influential theorists of "modernism", which deconstructs Nationalism as a modern kind of false consciousness created by elites, had a deep distrust of Nationalism motivated by the events of the war.

The Israeli historian Azar Gat writes the following: Image
10/25 But while the vision outlined by Hayek and Popper was more negative and moderate: piecemeal liberal social engineering or a night watchman state, academics from the left stepped in to provide a more radical anti-fascist critique which would shape generations of radicals. Image
11/25 Most influential in this regard is the Frankfurt School. A school of Jewish social theorists, they fled Hitler's Germany for the United States and set about reworking social theory, motivated by preventing the kind of reactionary totalitarianism they had observed in Europe. Image
12/25 The theories of the Frankfurt School, subsidised by American oligarchy with grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, would become the basis for the New Left of the 1960s.

Under the direction of Theodor Adorno, they published The Authoritarian Personality. ImageImage
13/25 This study purported to show that those who believed in traditional values were mentally ill, and this had it's roots in the family, especially belief in parental authority. An open society is not enough, what's required is deconstruction of these roots of authoritarianism. Image
14/25 The work influenced liberal policymakers bent on directing society away from reactionary attitudes.

The difficulty of this task was seen to reflect the dangerous force of traditional religion and faulty child-rearing. Now the family itself came under attack as a strong god Image
15/25 But it was the work of another Frankfurt School theorist Herbert Marcuse's which became the ideological basis for 60s counter-culture. The bestseller Eros and Civilization. Image
16/25 Marcuse argued that traditional societies were built on the repression of healthy human instincts and desires, particularly sexual, leading to alienation and unhappiness.

The answer was a revolutionary freeing up of sexual instinct, "polymorphous perversity". Image
17/25 During WW2, Marcuse had been employed by the OSS, the precursor to the CIA.

Marcuse drew up a list of 1800 businessmen and industrialists who should be considered key Nazis alongside military leadership. ImageImage
18/25 Marcuse and his colleagues argued dealing with these men was more important to De-Nazification of Germany than dealing with Prussian Militarism.

This was the basis for Frankfurt School theorising: Image
19/25 Members of the school all believed that Nazism was one expression of a ‘single paradigm of domination’, which also included Soviet Communism and liberal democracy.

All their major works can be read through this motive of identifying a deeper basis for de-Nazification. ImageImage
20/25 Most national hate speech laws have their precursors in their countries Holocaust denial laws, which normalised the idea of enshrining "group libel" in law.

This was a significant shift in what was viewed as acceptable political speech. Image
21/25 Though Britain did not have Holocaust denial laws, its first laws on hate speech were contained in the 1965 Race Relations Act.

The early advocates were inspired by their anti-fascist activities in London, and much of the debate centered on the German mistreatment of Jews. ImageImage
22/25 This is not to mention the entire ideological underpinning of the "rules based international order" established at the end of the war.

Many of the founding fathers of the European formulated their ideal as an anti-fascist alternative to German rule. ImageImageImageImage
23/25 Out of the war also came the basis for our conceptions of international law, war crimes, and the just war.

With the myth of the perfectly moral act of war of intervening to stop the Holocaust, liberals can justify any use of force against regimes violating "human rights" ImageImageImageImage
24/25 While the mood of post-war social theorists was moderate, the anti-fascist moral axiom contained a Manichean divide between the defenders of the open society and forces of fascism, which, with the input of Marxo-Freudians, included everything from science to parental roles. ImageImage
25/25 In an age apparently stripped of metaphysics and grand narratives, the only thing that fills the gap of meaning is the one moral absolute, the absolute evil of Auschwitz.

Everything is bad insofar as it is fascist, and everything is good insofar as it prevents fascism. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Keith Woods

Keith Woods Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KeithWoodsYT

May 12
Karl Popper | The Philosopher of Modern Liberalism

Probably no political philosopher's vision of things more definitively won out in the latter half of the 20th century than Karl Popper.

Popper, not Marx, is the philosopher of the modern left. Let's find out why.

1/25 🧵 Image
2/25 Karl Popper was born into a Viennese Jewish family that converted to Lutheranism.

Fearing his position as a Jew in post-Anschluss Austria, Popper moved to lecture in New Zealand in 1937. In 1946, he moved to the UK to join the London School of Economics Image
3/25 Popper's greatest contributions were to Philosophy of Science. At first influenced by positivism, he rejected their principle of verification, and popularised the principle of falsifiability - generalisations are only useful for science if they can in principle be falsified. Image
Read 25 tweets
May 10
The End of Race:

We have all heard the statement "we're all one race, the human race". Yet just a century ago the existence of distinct biological races was taken for granted. How did our perception of race change so drastically?

1/20 🧵 Image
2/20 Racial anthropology emerged as a distinct field of study in the 19th century.

By the late 19th C. and into the early 20th C. more genetic determinist accounts of race had begun to dominate the academy, alongside the rise of Social Darwinism and the eugenics movement. Image
3/20 By the 1920s and 30s, things began to move in a more environmentalist direction, largely due to the influential work of the anthropologist Franz Boas and his students. Image
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(