Court sat at about 9:10am.

Peter Obi and the National Women Leader have established presence in court as the Petitioners.

The court said it will not record names of anyone as representing anyone but will establish representation.

#LiveFromPEPT

Thread...
Only the Petitioners, 1st Respondent (INEC) and 4th Respondent (APC) are represented.

2nd (Bola) and 3rd (Shettima) Respondents are not represented in court.

The lawyers are now announcing appearances.

#LiveFromPEPT
Appearances are made by the lawyers in the order of Petitioner, 1st Respondent (INEC), 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents.

#LiveFromPEPT
Petitioners raised an issue before the court that the meetings scheduled with INEC and even for yesterday was not made possible as they have frustrated efforts to meet.

And, until this moment, Petitioners have only received not more than 30% of documents relevant to be rendered.
The Petitioners said, a typical example is that of Rivers State where the Resident Electoral Commissioner blatantly told them that 'THEY DONT HAVE ANY FORMS EC8A IN THEIR POSSESSION TO GIVE TO THE PETITIONERS'.

Petitioners requested the REC put this in writing, that was not done
The Court suggested that the issue raised as to not getting over 70% of documents from INEC should be deferred and raised when the issue it relates to comes up during the trial.

#LiveFromPEPT
4th Res.: They do not have any issues as to documents, however, the will reserve all objections and reservations regarding documents before the court until the time of their written addresses (final address to the court)

#LiveFromPEPT
Petnrs: Reiterated it's position on not getting over 70% of documents from INEC he reminded the court that there was an order made by the Court to inspect the documents and the option left is to make an application for an order of Subpoena on the 1st Res. to produce documents.
1st Res: INEC has provided all documents to Petnrs and the two states of concern are as follows.

Sokoto: the Petnrs refused to pay the sum of N1.5million in order to access the docents from Sokoto.

Rivers: some documents were given to the Petnrs but they refused to collect...
the documents ready until ALL THE DOCUMENTS concerning Rivers state were ready.

These are the words of Counsel representing INEC.
4th Res: The problem of the Petitioners is not accessing the documents of Sokoto, but they have refused to pay N1.5M to access it.

Since they have documents of 34 states, we can as well proceed with trial without just two states (Sokoto and Rivers) instead of stalling trial.
Petitioners: it's falsehood that we don't want to pay the necessary fees. The issue is not payment, but the fact that INEC has refused to provide the documents. We are willing to pay.

"Regarding Sokoto, I hope they'll not push me to the wall to say what will not be pleasing"
Petitioners: counsels are playing delay strategies. They filed some motions on Monday, filed 2 motion late Tuesday and some today morning. These are delays, but we promise to respond on or before Friday. We've always responded to all documents files by Counsels and will continue.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with #BroadcastPEPTlive UC Maxwell™ 𓃵

#BroadcastPEPTlive UC Maxwell™ 𓃵 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @UkomahM

May 10
Let's review the Supreme Court judgment of Adeleke and Oyetola...

Recall I told you that I won't make comments until I have digested the Judgment, however, for now, I'll work with the media reports.

I want the public to pay attention, but this attention is free of cost... Image
@thecableng reported that "The court further said that NO LAW REQUIRES PRESIDING OFFICERS TO TRANSMIT THE NUMBER OF ACCREDITED VOTERS or accreditation of the polls TO THE DATABASE or backend server of INEC by BVAS."

Let's probe the court's views in line with the law.

Follow me. Image
S.60(5), Electoral Act-EA provides that "The PRESIDING OFFICER SHALL TRANSFER the results INCLUDING TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCREDITED VOTERS (NAV) and the results of the ballot in a manner as prescribed by the Commission."

The law is unambiguous that the PO SHALL transfer Total NAV... Image
Read 11 tweets
May 9
My name is UC Maxwell, and my support for Peter Obi’s mandate remains firm. I am not interested in crumbs, access, or whatever. I simply want a better society. If you approve, RT. ✊

#SupportForPeterObi Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(