The story of the industrial revolution & post-WWII Welfare State in well known. So I focus on their general arguments & discussion of post-1980 trends (Chs. 8-11).🧵
I found P&P engaging, stimulating & thought-provoking. Some of its points are not new, but are articulated in ways that are useful. It offers a balanced view, highlighting the potential of new technologies but documenting concerning trends. It combines analysis & prescription.
To set the baseline, it is useful to consider this figure (with US data). 👇
Something happened in 1980 (the prior social pact was broken) that delinked gains in economic productivity from wages earned by workers. This led to growing income inequality.
Many now bet on technology as the solution to various problems. But P&P questions a hyper-optimistic view about technology & raises doubts about the potential contributions of some technologies to growth and issues general reservations about their contribution to social goals.👇
P&P specifies the conditions under which technology generates broad positive outcomes and the kinds of technology that are best for society.👇
P&P also argues strongly that the current “direction of technology” is not a positive one and offers some arguments about why this is so.👇
P&P is largely focused on the US, with side glances to Europe and China. However, it makes a few points about the impact of technology in the developing world.👇
Finally, P&P turns to politics, drawing inspiration from the Progressive Era in the US, & offers policy prescriptions (e.g., market incentives, breaking up big tech, tax reform, investing in workers, government leadership, etc.). These focus nearly entirely on the US.
Comments. P&P helps us think about some of the key economic challenges of our day. It counters the naïve optimism of many about the promises of technology. It gets at the roots of the misuse of technology-the power of “modern oligarchs.” It clarifies when technologies are useful.
Comments. P&P says little about technology in the developing world & choices in those settings.
It also glosses over how politics & democracy work, & thus how we move from policy prescription to policy decision & implementation.
Hopefully others will fill these gaps.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
La relación entre 𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗼 𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗮 es compleja y ha cambiado con el tiempo. Aquí presento citas de un libro de Bobbio sobre el tema que esclarecen lo que significa ser un demócrata y porque a veces hay fricción entre liberales y demócratas.
The Tradition in Context 1/2. Critical juncture research is a tradition that was launched by Seymour Lipset and Stein Rokkan in 1967. It is part of a large intellectual movement that embraces historical analysis and seeks to go beyond a focus on short-term causal relations.
The Tradition in Context 2/2. CJ research shares interests with comparative historical analysis, historical institutionalism, the new institutional economics, American Political Development, and historical political economy.
Ayer, en un panel en FLACSO-Ecuador, hablamos sobre la distinción entre problemas 𝘥𝘦 y 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 la democracia.👇
Así que aprovecho para aclarar su origen - y por qué y cómo la he usado.
Hilo largo
1/17 Democracia descontextualizada. Existe una tendencia en la Ciencia Política a estudiar la democracia como un conjunto de instituciones políticas aisladas de la sociedad. Esto es un problema: la democracia siempre debe entenderse en relación a su contexto social.
2/17 Definiciones maximalistas de democracia. Una respuesta a lo que se considera correctamente como un análisis descontextualizado de la democracia ha sido la propuesta de definiciones amplias de democracia que incluyen ciertas características de la sociedad.
𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗲𝗹 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗻 has been called “the greatest comparative historical sociologist of our time” (John Hall). He combines Weber & Marx but discusses military & geopolitics more. He integrates sociology & history. His work spans world history
🧵with resources on Mann’s works
𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀. Mann is best known for his four-volume work 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳, on the changes in power (economic, political, military, ideological) from around 3,000 BC to the present.👇
𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗜 Mann’s 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 Vol. I (1986) includes Chapter 1, which Mann says is the best thing he has written.👇
𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗲𝗹 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗻 ha sido llamado “el mayor sociólogo histórico comparativo de nuestro tiempo”. Combina a Weber y Marx, pero escribe sobre militares y geopolítica. Integra sociología e historia. Sus textos abarcan la historia mundial.
🧵con recursos sobre la obra de Mann
𝗙𝘂𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘀. Mann es mejor conocido por su obra en 4 volúmenes, 𝘓𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭, sobre los cambios de poder (económico, político, militar, ideológico) desde aproximadamente el 3.000 a.C. hasta la actualidad.👇
𝗙𝘂𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗜 El volumen de 𝘓𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 (1991 [1986]) incluye el Capítulo 1, una discusión de teoría que Mann dice es lo mejor que ha escrito.👇
¿Cómo puede usarse la comparación como método para aprender sobre América Latina y cómo puede usarse el estudio de América Latina para contribuir a las Ciencias Sociales?
Aquí discuto algunos problemas en el análisis comparativo y varias opciones.
🧵largo
¿𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗼 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗹? 𝗜 Existe una tendencia a ver la historia de Europa como historia universal y, por lo tanto, a considerar a América Latina como una desviación de ese patrón, al que le faltan varias cosas.
¿𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗼 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗹? 𝗜𝗜 La teoría de la modernización adoptó esta perspectiva. Y muchos trabajos siguen usando esta perspectiva. Un signo revelador de esta forma de pensar es que supone que hay una manera de hacer las cosas.