Read on Twitter
THREAD: @archeronpoint and I were discussing how an LE contributor can stay in his/her lane and still tweet and still provide insightful and accurate commentary so as to avoid a rabbit hole of wrong legal analysis.
Taking #BryanKohberger/#IdahoFour as an example, here are some Qs that an LE could address in commentary without exposure to criticism and correction:
1. How were you called/summoned to testify in GJ
2. What if the date coincided with your unavailability (sick, vacation etc)
3. Who asks you questions
4. Where do you sit
5. Are you excluded while other GJ witnesses are testifying?
6. Are you instructed to bring any documents?
2. What if the date coincided with your unavailability (sick, vacation etc)
3. Who asks you questions
4. Where do you sit
5. Are you excluded while other GJ witnesses are testifying?
6. Are you instructed to bring any documents?
7. Can you refer to your documents during testimony?
8. Do you meet and discuss your testimony with the prosecution beforehand?
9. Have you testified at GJ and later been called to testify at trial?
10. Are you under an obligation to keep you testimony confidential?
8. Do you meet and discuss your testimony with the prosecution beforehand?
9. Have you testified at GJ and later been called to testify at trial?
10. Are you under an obligation to keep you testimony confidential?
We literally came up with this list in under 1 minute bc inquiring minds want to know. This is fodder for many tweets, engagement, and several minutes of airtime. FWIW #EnlightenUs Meanwhile I (and several others of my esteemed colleagues on both sides of the fence)
are here to engage on any and all legal questions and issues from first hand experience and knowledge in criminal law and procedure. Good night ya'll.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
