As parliament debate #AccessToNature today, a personal essay.
Deep in my valley is a tree so old it makes my bones ache. There are only a handful like it in the country, and its boughs harbour some of our oldest stories.
Yet almost no-one has ever seen it. 🧵
That’s because it resides on a 5,000 acre private estate at the border of England & Wales.
The estate is old: Norman Conquest old. With the same family, the Scudamores, holding it since the 11th century.
But the tree is older still...
The Jack O’Kent Oak is named after a folk trickster of the border country, famed for outwitting the devil. Jack is said to have tied his hounds to the tree’s trunk, and discoursed with the devil from its branches.
He is our valley’s Twm Siôn Cati. Our poundshop Doctor Faustus.
So, the tree is famous. But famous for who?
As the website reads, “The deer park is permanently closed to the public.”
Or so it is today. The historical record reveals a different story.
Old maps show a public footpath crosses the estate, connecting the village below to the common above.
Yet at some point in the mid 20th century, it “disappeared” from the Ordnance Survey.
It passes right by the tree.
I don’t know how the path got magicked off the map.
But Kentchurch is not alone in being a large estate with a spectral footpath. Many used their power to redesign the Definitive Map in their interests. And if the cut-off deadline is not removed, they could be lost forever.
Worse than lost footpaths, across the country, whole villages were moved or destroyed to make space for estate parklands; all to create a picturesque of confected isolation.
So I set off to document the old path. ‘Trespassing’ the line where old rights still glimmer if you know where to look; connecting a heritage once held by everyone – and now by no one at all.
Initially, the weather was... unfavourable.
…But it soon cleared up. And, as I dropped off the common at Garway Hill, I started to notice hints of what had once been.
Like this stile: now obscured by barbed wire.
The further I went the more traces I found. Sunken tracks worked into the hillside by generations of feet, carts, wildlife, livestock.
Sites of movement, but also connection: linking commons, communities and their stories together.
Now, there was no one.
I scrambled over the deer fence and took in the view. Ravens cronked above, a Great Tit kicked off in the nearby scrub. Otherwise, silence.
Later, I’d stumble across an old cottage in the adjacent wood, long abandoned too.
Heading deeper into the park, I searched for the great oak.
It’s claimed Britain has so many ancient trees due to the preservation of estates like this. On the continent, revolution came, & erstwhile estate woodlands were converted into forestry, their veteran trees hacked down.
Silver linings, perhaps? Except, of course, many estates in Britain did the same thing.
And as I walked through the park, it seemed the superabundance of fallow deer was steadily killing off much of the medieval wood pasture, converting it to heathland.
Despite that, it must be said that large parts of this estate were in much better condition than the land around them.
No industrial farming here, and some gorgeous messy habitat outside of the deer fence, where nature is abundant. Here's a vid from a trip with my friend Rosie.
I traced the footpath - now a track for the keeper’s 4x4 - to the centre of the park. And there I found it: the Jack O’Kent Oak in all its gnarly splendour.
Bees had built a nest in one of its hollows. I could see the charred memento of a lightning strike in its tops.
And at its foot: a seat.
And so I sat. Perhaps for half an hour, maybe more.
I find being with something so old yet alive does unusual things to the mind. Time stretches. There’s a reorientation of the ego, a dual sense of finitude amid infinity that's strangely comforting.
...though perhaps a little less when I’m worried about being busted by the keeper. A 4x4 sailed by in the distance. Happily, they didn't see me.
Trees like this oak root religions, seed stories. They are sacred in a way that is both soft & open.
But when we enclose culture behind fences we amputate those stories from their source. The less we have these old things to anchor us, the harder it is for something new to grow.
When campaigning for @Right_2Roam I’m often asked: “you already have 140,000 miles of footpath! Why do you need more?”
And there are many practical answers: the fate of Kentchurch’s footpath illustrates one.
But there’s something deeper in that question that I find saddening.
Because when someone asks "Why do you need more?” I want to respond with the simple, obvious question:
Why do you need less?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People have some bizarre (and sometimes, unhinged) ideas about how humans move in the landscape when they're given unrestricted access.
No, they don't trample every bluebell. Nor do they carry out search & destroy operations on every bird nest.
Here are some examples 🧵
Local to me. Not a right of way, just a popular informal desire line linking the suburb to a nearby footpath (sections of our Right of Way network are only functional *because* of such informal paths).
I'll repeat: not an official footpath. Yet look how disciplined the line is.
Most good habitat is naturally defensive.
This wood has open access: you can theoretically go anywhere you like. In practice, when paths make sense - people use them.
Note how the relatively healthy, scrappy understory negotiates a natural relationship with human presence.
How is the animal killed? A clean shot from a skilled marksman is clearly preferable to dogs chasing frightened quarry across the landscape before ripping it to pieces, abetted by humans on horseback. What skill threshold is in place before shooting can take place?
(Yes, as followers of the Nature Is Metal Instagram know all too well: nature is more amoral than that. But we’re not talking about natural predation, we’re talking about an artificial human intervention. It’s right that welfare is a factor).
Where to start with this @FarmersWeekly piece on @Right_2Roam which seems to have no idea what is being proposed & bemoans the loss of opportunities to "monetise partnerships with healthcare providers as solutions to the UK’s health and wellbeing crisis". fwi.co.uk/news/opinion-r…
Firstly, the RTR proposals are not an "all-access approach". They simply mean exclusions should be justified on reasonable grounds not arbitrary whims.
What those are is up to us. You can see the list of exclusions used in the Scottish model, which we would like to adopt, here.
It means the "inner city kids" the author invites for one-off visits to his farm are empowered - yes, have a *right* - to experience the 'spontaneous high' of nature in their own time, on their own terms, at their own discretion, in a way which might *genuinely* be spontaneous.
Last week @UKLabour clarified its vision for an English Right to Roam Act, looking to the Scottish model to replace “a default of exclusion with a default of access”. But what does this mean and why is it important? 🧵
Currently in England there is around 8% of access rights to land, and 3% of (undisputed) access to rivers.
This primarily consists of the footpath network [0.3%] (as much of 49,000 miles of which may be missing) and open access land, covering ‘mountain, moor, heath and down’.
Most access land derives from the Countryside & Rights of Way Act (2000). In some parts of the country, it’s great. The Peak District for instance has around 72% of land dedicated to open access, providing a much used, and well loved, place for people to access the natural world.
UPDATE: I met the farmer doing this yesterday. The conversation we had was NUTS. He's tearing down all this amazing successional habitat, which has been naturally afforesting for about fifteen years, so that he can get paid to plant... Trees.
The Welsh Government have said they want farmers to have 10% tree cover on their land. But because they haven't specified the conditions, the farmer said he needs to "keep his options open" -- by removing as much existing, natural tree cover as he can.
I said surely this would be considered woodland by now and that he'd need a felling license.
Nope: he'd been visited by @NatResWales who said it was fine because the trees weren't big enough. Which de facto means you can fell one of the most important habitat types that exist.
While we take stock of big, new losses in Dartmoor, I want to take a moment to talk about the micro enclosures happening every day around the country. They’ll never make the headlines. But they completely shape the way we live our lives.
This is mine. 🧵
Near where I live is an old weir. I know weirs are bad for rivers but I'm extremely fond of it. I swim here. I watch the dippers when I’m sad. If I need to clear my head, this is where I come. You can sit on its wall, water at every side, and simply be.
It’s part of who I am.
But about 15 years ago @NatResWales decided to mitigate the weir’s impact on the river. Salmon were struggling to make their spawning grounds. Trout numbers were in decline.
The weir was another obstacle in a deteriorating ecosystem, beleaguered by agricultural runoff upstream.